<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>North Fork Preservation Association &#187; nfpa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gravel.org/author/nfpa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gravel.org</link>
	<description>News and information about the NFPA and the North Fork of the Flathead River</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Forest Service announces plans to boost timber production, forest health work</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2012/02/03/u-s-forest-service-announces-plans-to-boost-timber-production-forest-health-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2012/02/03/u-s-forest-service-announces-plans-to-boost-timber-production-forest-health-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuels reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timber harvest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Forest Service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From today&#8217;s Missoulian . . . The U.S. Forest Service wants to speed up work on national forests, for both timber production and forest health. &#8220;Collaboration is most effective in getting forests managed in a proper way,&#8221; Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said during a conference call on Thursday. &#8220;We want to move beyond the conflicts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From today&#8217;s Missoulian . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>The U.S. Forest Service wants to speed up work on national forests, for both timber production and forest health.</p>
<p>&#8220;Collaboration is most effective in getting forests managed in a proper way,&#8221; Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said during a conference call on Thursday. &#8220;We want to move beyond the conflicts in the past that slowed progress down. We&#8217;re going to look to encourage environmentalists, folks in the forest industry, people who live in forest communities and other stakeholders to work for healthy forests.&#8221;</p>
<p>Vilsack pledged the Forest Service would boost its lumber production from 2.4 billion board feet in 2011 to 3 billion board feet by 2014. That would come through a 20 percent increase in forest acres treated over the next three years.</p>
<p>Those treatments also include fuels reduction, reforestation, stream restoration, road decommissioning, culvert work and prescribed fire, as well as timber harvesting.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="http://missoulian.com/news/local/u-s-forest-service-plans-to-boost-timber-production-forest/article_710829e8-4e16-11e1-aff9-001871e3ce6c.html">Continue reading . . .</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2012/02/03/u-s-forest-service-announces-plans-to-boost-timber-production-forest-health-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Larry Wilson: Be prepared for winter travel</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2012/02/02/larry-wilson-be-prepared-for-winter-travel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2012/02/02/larry-wilson-be-prepared-for-winter-travel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avalanche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winter survival]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[in his column this week, Larry talks about winter recreation and the importance of basic survival preparedness . . . I guess it&#8217;s human nature to worry about the weather, or at least talk about it. Even so, I can&#8217;t help but wonder why people don&#8217;t think, talk and worry about things that would save [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in his column this week, Larry talks about winter recreation and the importance of basic survival preparedness . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>I guess it&#8217;s human nature to worry about the weather, or at least talk about it. Even so, I can&#8217;t help but wonder why people don&#8217;t think, talk and worry about things that would save them time, money or even lives.</p>
<p>A week or so ago, the North Valley Rescue Association conducted snowmobile training in the Canyon Creek area. This is a popular snowmobiling area, with miles and miles of groomed trails and an area where snowmobilers of all abilities can really enjoy themselves out of doors.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also an area where, just a few years ago, a person was caught in an avalanche and killed.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="http://www.flatheadnewsgroup.com/hungryhorsenews/opinion/columns/article_ba228a42-4cef-11e1-8cf4-0019bb2963f4.html">Continue reading . . .</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2012/02/02/larry-wilson-be-prepared-for-winter-travel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wolf hunt closed in North Fork area</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2012/02/01/wolf-hunt-closed-in-north-fork-area/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2012/02/01/wolf-hunt-closed-in-north-fork-area/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana FWP Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolf hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolf Management Unit 110]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolf population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolf quotas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a little more detail on the closure of the wolf hunt in the North Fork area, as well as general hunt status in this corner of Montana . . . A wolf hunting district covering the North Fork Flathead drainage has been closed by the state because the district’s wolf quota recently was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a little more detail on the closure of the wolf hunt in the North Fork area, as well as general hunt status in this corner of Montana . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>A wolf hunting district covering the North Fork Flathead drainage has been closed by the state because the district’s wolf quota recently was reached.</p>
<p>Wolf Management Unit 110 had a quota for two wolves to be harvested by hunters with wolf permits. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks announced the closure Tuesday.</p>
<p>Only one other wolf-hunting district in Northwest Montana has been closed. District 101 covering the Salish Mountains west of Kalispell had a quota of 19 wolves that was reached Dec. 29.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="http://www.dailyinterlake.com/news/local_montana/article_99016ca2-4c81-11e1-a59c-001871e3ce6c.html">Continue reading . . .</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2012/02/01/wolf-hunt-closed-in-north-fork-area/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next North Fork Interlocal Agreement meeting on Feb. 15 in Glacier Park</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/31/next-north-fork-interlocal-agreement-meeting-on-feb-15-in-glacier-park/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/31/next-north-fork-interlocal-agreement-meeting-on-feb-15-in-glacier-park/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glacier Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Interlocal Agreement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Emmerich, North Fork District Ranger, sent out the following announcement a couple of days ago concerning the upcoming Interlocal Meeting in Glacier Park . . . &#160; We&#8217;re trying to go &#8220;paperless&#8221; with our Interlocal Meeting notifications this winter.  It would be helpful to me if you&#8217;d spread the word to those in your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Scott Emmerich, North Fork District Ranger, sent out the following announcement a couple of days ago concerning the upcoming Interlocal Meeting in Glacier Park . . .</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>We&#8217;re trying to go &#8220;paperless&#8221; with our Interlocal Meeting notifications this winter.  It would be helpful to me if you&#8217;d spread the word to those in your span of relationships who would benefit from attending.  Thank you.</p>
<p>The main goal of the meeting is to foster open communication among North Fork neighbors.   It may be helpful to meet one-on-one with specific agency representatives prior to the meeting if you are hoping to obtain information that may require some extended research.  I can help provide you with phone numbers and/or email addresses to facilitate this connection.</p>
<p>The agenda is time-tested, absolutely adjustable and remarkably similar year after year:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">NORTH FORK INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT MEETING<br />
WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 15, 2012 10a.m.-1p.m<br />
COMMUNITY BUILDING, GLACIER NATIONAL PARK</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT LANDOWNER UPDATES</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">North Fork Compact<br />
North Fork Preservation Association<br />
North Fork Land Owners Association<br />
North Fork Road Coalition for Health &amp; Safety</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>AGENCY UPDATES</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">US Fish &amp; Wildlife Service<br />
MT FW&amp;P<br />
MT Department of State Lands<br />
Flathead County<br />
Flathead National Forest<br />
Homeland Security (US Border Patrol)<br />
Glacier National Park</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>SPECIAL AGENDA TOPICS</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(To be determined.)</p>
<p>Host &amp; Date for Summer 2012 Interlocal?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Please contact me if you have special needs as they relate to the meeting.</p>
<p>I hope to see you in a few weeks!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Scott</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Scott Emmerich<br />
North Fork District Ranger<br />
Glacier National Park<br />
(406)888-7842</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/31/next-north-fork-interlocal-agreement-meeting-on-feb-15-in-glacier-park/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wolf hunt closes along Glacier Park border</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/31/wolf-hunt-closes-along-glacier-park-border/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/31/wolf-hunt-closes-along-glacier-park-border/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana FWP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolf hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolf population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolf quotas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wolf hunt is officially over for the North Fork and environs. Here is the press release . . . The hunting of all wolves in Montana Wolf Management Unit 110 which includes portions of Lincoln and Flathead Counties, in northwestern Montana, will close Wednesday, February 1, 2012 at one half-hour after sunset. The order [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wolf hunt is officially over for the North Fork and environs. Here is the press release . . .</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The hunting of all wolves in Montana Wolf Management Unit 110 which includes portions of Lincoln and Flathead Counties, in northwestern Montana, will close Wednesday, February 1, 2012 at one half-hour after sunset.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The order halting the hunt came after Montana Fish, Wildlife &amp; Parks officials received word that the pre-established harvest quota for wolves in the WMU had been met.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">For more information, visit FWP’s website at <a href="http://fwp.mt.gov/" target="_blank">fwp.mt.gov</a> click &#8220;Montana Wolf Hunt,&#8221;or call the toll-free number at 1-800-385-7826.</p>
<p>And here is a related Associated Press article . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Montana officials are closing down wolf hunting in parts of northwestern Montana bordering Glacier National Park after hunters filled the area&#8217;s two-animal quota.</p>
<p>Hunting closes after sunset Wednesday in portions of Lincoln and Flathead counties west of the park.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com//articles/article/montana_wolf_hunting_closes_along_glacier_national_park_border/26454/" target="_blank">Continue reading . . .</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/31/wolf-hunt-closes-along-glacier-park-border/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California gets its very own wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/27/california-gets-its-very-own-wolf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/27/california-gets-its-very-own-wolf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OR7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolf recovery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First the grizzlies started moving back out onto the high plains, now a young male wolf called &#8220;OR7&#8243; has wandered into California. California being California, it&#8217;s a big deal. The New York Times has the story. It includes some pointed observations by Ed Bangs, the recently retired U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wolf recovery coordinator [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First the grizzlies started moving back out onto the high plains, now a young male wolf called &#8220;OR7&#8243; has wandered into California. California being California, it&#8217;s a big deal. The New York Times has the story. It includes some pointed observations by <a href="http://www.gravel.org/2011/04/24/adventures-in-wolf-recovery-ending-for-ed-bangs-as-he-retires-from-usfws/" target="_blank">Ed Bangs</a>, the recently retired U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wolf recovery coordinator for the Northern Rockies. . .</p>
<blockquote><p>SAN FRANCISCO — On the Chinese calendar, this week ushers in the year of the dragon. But here, it feels a lot more like the year of the wolf</p>
<p>On Dec. 28, a 2 1/2 -year-old gray wolf crossed the state line from Oregon, becoming the first of his species to run wild here in 88 years.</p>
<p>His arrival has prompted news articles, attracted feverish fans and sent wildlife officials scrambling to prepare for a new and unfamiliar predator.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/28/us/wildlife-activists-follow-lone-wolfs-trek-into-california.html">Continue reading . . .</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/27/california-gets-its-very-own-wolf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds release new national forest management rules</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/27/feds-release-new-national-forest-management-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/27/feds-release-new-national-forest-management-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national forest plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national forest planning rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Forest Service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a pretty useful write-up on the proposed new national forest planning rule. Or, for those of you who like to read source documents, the official U.S. Forest Service press release and a link to the (take a deep breath) &#8220;Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for the National Forest System Land Management Planning Rule&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a pretty useful write-up on the proposed new national forest planning rule. Or, for those of you who like to read source documents, the official U.S. Forest Service press release and a link to the (take a deep breath) &#8220;Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for the National Forest System Land Management Planning Rule&#8221; can be found online at the Forest Service web site . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>A proposed planning rule for managing national forests puts new emphasis on watershed health and recreation, but also strives to keep loggers in the woods, U.S. Forest Service officials said Thursday.</p>
<p>The national rule will guide local forest supervisors when they make their more specific forest management plans. Those plans govern where trees can be cut, the kinds of wildlife to watch out for, activities allowed in campgrounds and the backcountry, and how people can challenge forest decisions.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="http://missoulian.com/news/local/obama-administration-releases-new-national-forest-management-rules/article_b1ad3ad6-4855-11e1-8b93-0019bb2963f4.html">Continue reading . . .</a></em></p>
<p><em>More information: <a href="http://www.fs.fed.us/news/2012/releases/01/planning-rule.shtml" target="_blank">Press release and link to U.S. Forest Service&#8217;s draft planning rule</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/27/feds-release-new-national-forest-management-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama administration releases new forest management rules</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/26/obama-administration-releases-new-forest-management-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/26/obama-administration-releases-new-forest-management-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national forest plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national forest planning rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Forest Service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A shiny, new set of national forest management rules are due to take effect in early March . . . The Obama administration says new rules to manage nearly 200 million acres of national forests will protect watersheds and wildlife while promoting uses ranging from recreation to logging. The new rules, to replace guidelines thrown [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A shiny, new set of national forest management rules are due to take effect in early March . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>The Obama administration says new rules to manage nearly 200 million acres of national forests will protect watersheds and wildlife while promoting uses ranging from recreation to logging.</p>
<p>The new rules, to replace guidelines thrown out by a federal court in 2009, are set to take effect in early March. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced the rule change on Thursday.</p>
<p>Vilsack said in an interview that the rules reflect more than 300,000 comments received since a draft plan was released last year. The new rules strengthen a requirement that decisions be based on the best available science and recognize that forests are used for a variety of purposes, Vilsack said.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com//articles/article/obama_admin_says_new_forest_rules_stress_science/26331/">Continue reading . . .</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/26/obama-administration-releases-new-forest-management-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Larry Wilson: Worrying about weather, floods and fires</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/25/larry-wilson-worrying-about-weather-floods-and-fires/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/25/larry-wilson-worrying-about-weather-floods-and-fires/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildfires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, Larry talks about folk&#8217;s penchant to worry about the weather . . . Apparently we humans have an inbred need to worry about something all of the time. In the first week of January, I heard several people comment that they were worried that if it didn&#8217;t snow soon, we would have a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, Larry talks about folk&#8217;s penchant to worry about the weather . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Apparently we humans have an inbred need to worry about something all of the time. In the first week of January, I heard several people comment that they were worried that if it didn&#8217;t snow soon, we would have a really bad fire season next summer.</p>
<p>Now that we have had a week of fairly heavy snowfall (about two feet on Trail Creek, one foot in town), two people have commented that if this keeps up for two weeks, we&#8217;re likely to have spring floods.</p>
<p>Personally, I try not to worry about things that I can&#8217;t change or affect in any way &#8211; like the weather. Besides, a heavy snowpack does not mean there will be spring floods. Look at last winter. Record snowfall in the mountains. In many places, over 200 percent of normal. Despite the snow, we did not have severe flooding.</p>
<p>Same thing with fires. Many an open winter has been followed by a summer with few fires. Spring flooding and a severe fire season are usually the result of spring weather, not what happened in the previous winter.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="http://www.flatheadnewsgroup.com/hungryhorsenews/opinion/columns/article_5fb9f5b0-476b-11e1-8cd8-001871e3ce6c.html">Continue reading . . .</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/25/larry-wilson-worrying-about-weather-floods-and-fires/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Larry Wilson: The North Fork Road is no longer an issue</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/18/larry-wilson-the-north-fork-road-is-no-longer-an-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/18/larry-wilson-the-north-fork-road-is-no-longer-an-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorandum of understanding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transboundary Flathead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Larry does a retrospective on the big issues of last year, including the North Fork Road and successful efforts to terminate resource extraction activities in the transboundary Flathead Valley . . . January is the month when everyone looks back on the previous year to see what the biggest news stories were and to make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry does a retrospective on the big issues of last year, including the North Fork Road and successful efforts to terminate resource extraction activities in the transboundary Flathead Valley . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>January is the month when everyone looks back on the previous year to see what the biggest news stories were and to make resolutions for the year that is just beginning. Hopefully, the resolutions will improve us in some way. We are no different on the North Fork.</p>
<p>For many years, the North Fork Road has been the biggest topic of controversy in the area &#8211; pave or don&#8217;t pave? Not in 2011. County improvements have reduced the road almost to a non-issue.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="http://www.flatheadnewsgroup.com/hungryhorsenews/opinion/columns/article_65e65cca-41ea-11e1-9bf6-0019bb2963f4.html">Continue reading . . .</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2012/01/18/larry-wilson-the-north-fork-road-is-no-longer-an-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

