<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>North Fork Preservation Association &#187; Environmental Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gravel.org/category/environmental-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gravel.org</link>
	<description>News and information about the NFPA and the North Fork of the Flathead River</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:29:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>UNESCO warns of threats to wildlife in the Flathead and surrounding areas</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/30/unesco-warns-of-threats-to-wildlife-in-the-flathead-and-surrounding-areas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/30/unesco-warns-of-threats-to-wildlife-in-the-flathead-and-surrounding-areas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNESCO World Heritage Committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted today to the Flathead Wild website . . .
Work still needs to be done to protect wildlife in the Flathead and surrounding areas, and to ensure that Rocky Mountain wildlife connectivity is not compromised by forestry practices and other development, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee said today in a &#8220;state of conservation&#8221; report.
The state [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted today to the Flathead Wild website . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Work still needs to be done to protect wildlife in the Flathead and surrounding areas, and to ensure that Rocky Mountain wildlife connectivity is not compromised by forestry practices and other development, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee said today in a &#8220;state of conservation&#8221; report.</p>
<p>The state of conservation report recommends &#8220;development of a pro-active plan for enhancing connectivity&#8221; in the Flathead River Valley and adjoining areas. It also raises concerns about proposed mine expansions in southeastern British Columbia, adjacent to the Flathead, &#8220;in a corridor providing vital habitat connectivity to the Rocky Mountains World Heritage property in Alberta&#8221; [the Banff, Jasper, Yoho and Kootenay National Parks].</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.flathead.ca/node/509">Read the entire article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/30/unesco-warns-of-threats-to-wildlife-in-the-flathead-and-surrounding-areas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Fork Road draft study released, discussed</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/29/north-fork-road-draft-study-released-discussed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/29/north-fork-road-draft-study-released-discussed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corridor study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dust abatement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the Flathead Beacon&#8217;s take on last Tuesday’s public open house to discuss the North Fork Road corridor study draft . . .
To pave or not to pave? The question of what to do with the North Fork Road was further debated Tuesday night in Columbia Falls. Residents, local business owners and Flathead County officials [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the Flathead Beacon&#8217;s take on last Tuesday’s public open house to discuss the North Fork Road corridor study draft . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>To pave or not to pave? The question of what to do with the North Fork Road was further debated Tuesday night in Columbia Falls. Residents, local business owners and Flathead County officials gathered at the Glacier Discovery Square to discuss the recently released draft of a $125,000 study on the corridor.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/north_fork_road_draft_study_released/18881/">Read the full article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/29/north-fork-road-draft-study-released-discussed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lack of money likely to deter North Fork Road paving plans &#8212; for now, at least</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/29/lack-of-money-likely-to-deter-north-fork-road-paving-plans-for-now-at-least/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/29/lack-of-money-likely-to-deter-north-fork-road-paving-plans-for-now-at-least/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corridor study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dust abatement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Dupont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the Daily Inter Lake&#8217;s write-up on last Tuesday’s public open house to discuss the North Fork Road corridor study draft. If for no other reason, it&#8217;s worth reading for Flathead County Commissioner Jim Dupont&#8217;s pragmatic comments . . .
To pave or not to pave may not be the question.
Due to lack of money, Flathead [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the Daily Inter Lake&#8217;s write-up on last Tuesday’s public open house to discuss the North Fork Road corridor study draft. If for no other reason, it&#8217;s worth reading for Flathead County Commissioner Jim Dupont&#8217;s pragmatic comments . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>To pave or not to pave may not be the question.</p>
<p>Due to lack of money, Flathead County Commissioner Jim Dupont said the long-talked-about paving of the North Fork Road will not likely happen anytime soon unless the federal government decides to pay for it.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyinterlake.com/news/local_montana/article_00f3edce-9ab0-11df-b493-001cc4c03286.html">Read the full article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/29/lack-of-money-likely-to-deter-north-fork-road-paving-plans-for-now-at-least/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public comments sought on North Fork Road corridor study draft</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/29/public-comments-sought-on-north-fork-road-corridor-study-draft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/29/public-comments-sought-on-north-fork-road-corridor-study-draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corridor study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dust abatement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week&#8217;s Hungry Horse News has a good summary of last Tuesday&#8217;s public open house to discuss the North Fork Road corridor study draft.
Note that public comments are due by August 10. Send e-mail to mdtnffrteam@mt.gov or write to Lani Eggertsen-Goff, PB 488 E. Wincester Street, Suite 400, Murray, UT 84107. The draft corridor study [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s Hungry Horse News has a good summary of last Tuesday&#8217;s public open house to discuss the North Fork Road corridor study draft.</p>
<p><em>Note that public comments are due by August 10. Send e-mail to <a href="mailto:mdtnffrteam@mt.gov">mdtnffrteam@mt.gov</a> or write to Lani Eggertsen-Goff, PB 488 E. Wincester Street, Suite 400, Murray, UT 84107. The draft corridor study can be viewed online at <a href="http://www.mdt.mt.gov/pubinvolve/northfork/">http://www.mdt.mt.gov/pubinvolve/northfork/</a>. (Warning! Some big files.)</em></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the lead-in from the HHN write-up . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>The public was invited to give comment at the North Fork Flathead Road meeting Tuesday, July 27, which will be entered as part of the final Corridor Study Document.</p>
<p>At the meeting, representatives from Parsons Brinckerhoff — the group commissioned to conduct the study — answered questions.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.flatheadnewsgroup.com/articles/2010/07/29/hungryhorsenews/news/news_8719667012_01.txt">Read the entire article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/29/public-comments-sought-on-north-fork-road-corridor-study-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UNESCO World Heritage Committee report recommends increased Flathead Valley protection</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/27/unesco-world-heritage-committee-report-recommends-increased-flathead-valley-protection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/27/unesco-world-heritage-committee-report-recommends-increased-flathead-valley-protection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead River Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transboundary Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNESCO World Heritage Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterton Lakes National Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UNESCO World Heritage Committee released the final report of the scientific mission study of threats to Waterton-Glacier Park. A press release posted to the Flathead Wild website has the highlights . . .
A report commissioned by the UNESCO World Heritage Committee is calling for a “conservation and wildlife management plan” for the transboundary Flathead [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UNESCO World Heritage Committee released the final report of the scientific mission study of threats to Waterton-Glacier Park. A <a href="http://www.flathead.ca/node/508">press release posted to the Flathead Wild website</a> has the highlights . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>A report commissioned by the UNESCO World Heritage Committee is calling for a “conservation and wildlife management plan” for the transboundary Flathead and a new management plan for the Flathead River Valley that “gives priority to natural ecological values and wildlife conservation.”&#8230;</p>
<p>The 50-page report, released today at the World Heritage Committee meeting in Brasilia, recommends:</p>
<ul>
<li>A new B.C. Southern Rocky Mountains Management Plan “that gives priority to natural ecological values and wildlife conservation.”</li>
<li>Taking steps to minimize barriers to wildlife connectivity, including a long-term moratorium on further mining developments in south eastern B.C., including in the Elk Valley, “in the corridor of natural terrain that creates vital habitat connectivity and allows the unimpeded movement of carnivores and ungulates” between Waterton-Glacier and Canada’s Rocky Mountains national parks.</li>
<li>A single conservation and wildlife management plan for the transboundary Flathead.</li>
<li>Inscription of Waterton-Glacier on the list of World Heritage in Danger if development of the proposed Lodgepole coal strip mine had proceeded (the B.C. government banned Flathead mining and energy development in February 2010 after receiving a draft copy of the mission report).</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p><strong><em>For those of you who prefer to get your information directly from source documents, <a href="http://www.gravel.org/files/WATERTON%20MISSION%20REPORT%20FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">we&#8217;ve made the full report available for direct viewing/download</a></em></strong> (50 pages, PDF format, 2MB).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/27/unesco-world-heritage-committee-report-recommends-increased-flathead-valley-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meeting scheduled to review draft North Fork Road corridor study</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/24/meeting-scheduled-to-review-draft-north-fork-road-corridor-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/24/meeting-scheduled-to-review-draft-north-fork-road-corridor-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 21:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corridor study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dust abatement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s some more information on the upcoming public meeting on the North Fork Road corridor study from yesterday&#8217;s Daily Inter Lake . . .
An open-house-style meeting has been scheduled for the public to review and give comments on the corridor study of a portion of the North Fork Road.
The meeting will start at 6:30 p.m. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s some more information on the upcoming public meeting on the North Fork Road corridor study from yesterday&#8217;s Daily Inter Lake . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>An open-house-style meeting has been scheduled for the public to review and give comments on the corridor study of a portion of the North Fork Road.</p>
<p>The meeting will start at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, July 27, at the Discovery Center at 540 Nucleus Ave., Columbia Falls. As an open-house style meeting, no formal presentation will be given.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyinterlake.com/news/local_montana/article_27e8ec7c-95ec-11df-822d-001cc4c002e0.html">Read the entire article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/24/meeting-scheduled-to-review-draft-north-fork-road-corridor-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UNESCO World Heritage Committee report to be released soon</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/22/unesco-world-heritage-committee-report-to-be-released-soon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/22/unesco-world-heritage-committee-report-to-be-released-soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 04:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead Wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNESCO World Heritage Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a post on the Flathead Wild site today, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee report on threats to Waterton-Glacier Park and its environs will be released at the committee&#8217;s meeting in Brasilia, which begins tomorrow.
We&#8217;ll provide access to the report once it becomes available.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.flathead.ca/node/507">a post on the Flathead Wild site</a> today, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee report on threats to Waterton-Glacier Park and its environs will be released at the committee&#8217;s meeting in Brasilia, which begins tomorrow.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll provide access to the report once it becomes available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/22/unesco-world-heritage-committee-report-to-be-released-soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Draft North Fork Road corridor study document is now available; meeting on July 27th</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/21/draft-north-fork-road-corridor-study-document-is-now-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/21/draft-north-fork-road-corridor-study-document-is-now-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corridor study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dust abatement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to an email sent out yesterday afternoon by Pam Murray of PB Americas, the draft North Fork Road corridor study document is now available online and, for those of you traveling down-valley, on paper. (If you came late to the party, the corridor study is a $125K project looking at alternatives for improving the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to an email sent out yesterday afternoon by Pam Murray of PB Americas, the draft North Fork Road corridor study document is now available online and, for those of you traveling down-valley, on paper. (If you came late to the party, the corridor study is a $125K project looking at alternatives for improving the condition of the North Fork Road from Blankenship Road to Camas Junction.)</p>
<p>Ms. Murray said,</p>
<blockquote><p>The draft corridor study document is now available for your review, please visit the website: <a href="http://www.mdt.mt.gov/pubinvolve/northfork/documents.shtml">http://www.mdt.mt.gov/pubinvolve/northfork/documents.shtml</a> and if the link does not work you can find the document by going to the study webpage at <a href="http://www.mdt.mt.gov/pubinvolve/northfork/">http://www.mdt.mt.gov/pubinvolve/northfork/</a> From the menu on the left go to “documents” and then clicking section by section on the draft document.</p>
<p>The whole document is available as one file, however it is a very large file (over 20 M) and will probably time out for most people before the download is complete.</p>
<p>Paper copies of the draft corridor study document are also available at these locations:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Columbia Falls Library, 130 6th  Street West</li>
<li>Flathead County Offices, 800 South Main Street, Kalispell</li>
<li>MDT Office, 85 5th Ave East North, Kalispell</li>
</ul>
<p>Please review the draft corridor study document.  We also invite you to attend the public meeting on July 27, 2010 at Discovery Square, Sperry Auditorium anytime between 6:30 pm and 8:30 pm&#8230;</p>
<p>The purpose of the public meeting is to receive your comments on the draft corridor study document.  If you are unable to attend the meeting next week you can provide us comments on the draft corridor study document using the “comment on this study” link from the study webpage (see above link).</p></blockquote>
<p>Additional information&#8230;</p>
<p>The entire current set of documents discussing the corridor study includes:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.mdt.mt.gov/pubinvolve/northfork/docs/draft_corridor_study.pdf" target="_blank">The main draft corridor study</a> (56 pages, 20.2MB) and three appendices &#8211;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.mdt.mt.gov/pubinvolve/northfork/docs/appendixa.pdf" target="_blank">Appendix A: Environmental Scan Report</a> (40 pages, 3.7MB),</li>
<li><a href="http://www.mdt.mt.gov/pubinvolve/northfork/docs/appendixb.pdf" target="_blank">Appendix B: Consultation and Coordination, Public Involvement</a> (209 pages, 12.3MB), and</li>
<li><a href="http://www.mdt.mt.gov/pubinvolve/northfork/docs/appendixc.pdf" target="_blank">Appendix C: Improvement Options</a> (7 pages, 82KB).</li>
</ul>
<p>The following poster includes more information about the meeting on July 27th. Note this little item near the bottom: &#8220;For reasonable accommodations to participate in the meeting, please contact Paul Grant at 406/444.9415 at least two days before the meeting.&#8221; In other words, if you want to get up and say something, call ahead.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gravel.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/PosterLowRes-01.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1149" title="Corridor Study Announcement" src="http://www.gravel.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/PosterLowRes-01.jpg" alt="Corridor Study Announcement" width="600" height="927" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/21/draft-north-fork-road-corridor-study-document-is-now-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>B.C. Premier expects to know mining costs soon on North Fork deal</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/18/b-c-premier-expects-to-know-mining-costs-soon-on-north-fork-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/18/b-c-premier-expects-to-know-mining-costs-soon-on-north-fork-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Schweitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead River Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining leases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From today&#8217;s Flathead Beacon . . .
Accepting the Flathead Lakers’ 2010 Stewardship Award for signing an agreement with British Columbia protecting the North Fork from mining and drilling, Gov. Brian Schweitzer gave much of the credit to his counterpart in the negotiations: Premier Gordon Campbell.
Describing the fragile talks, held secretly in Spokane, Schweitzer emphasized that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From today&#8217;s Flathead Beacon . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Accepting the Flathead Lakers’ 2010 Stewardship Award for signing an agreement with British Columbia protecting the North Fork from mining and drilling, Gov. Brian Schweitzer gave much of the credit to his counterpart in the negotiations: Premier Gordon Campbell.</p>
<p>Describing the fragile talks, held secretly in Spokane, Schweitzer emphasized that – from mining royalties to political capital – it was Campbell who had the most at stake.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/b.c._premier_expects_to_know_mining_costs_soon_on_north_fork_deal/18679/">Read the full article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/18/b-c-premier-expects-to-know-mining-costs-soon-on-north-fork-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting the North Fork must be a team effort</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/17/protecting-the-north-fork-must-be-a-team-effort/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/17/protecting-the-north-fork-must-be-a-team-effort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Schweitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Hadden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headwaters Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trans-boundary Flathead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave Hadden, Executive Director of Headwaters Montana, had a letter to the editor published in today&#8217;s Flathead Beacon . . .
The North Fork of the Flathead River (a.k.a. the Transboundary Flathead) continues to play in the news of late. The news media report that Gov. Brian Schweitzer and Sens. Max Baucus and Jon Tester are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Hadden, Executive Director of Headwaters Montana, had a letter to the editor published in today&#8217;s Flathead Beacon . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>The North Fork of the Flathead River (a.k.a. the Transboundary Flathead) continues to play in the news of late. The news media report that Gov. Brian Schweitzer and Sens. Max Baucus and Jon Tester are at odds over how to best protect our river, Glacier Park and Flathead Lake from upstream industrial activity. While a bit confusing to the reader, we think it&#8217;s important to keep the North Fork in the news for one simple reason: Our fabulous North Fork ain&#8217;t protected yet.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/letter_protecting_the_north_fork_must_be_a_team_effort/18674/">Read the complete letter . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/17/protecting-the-north-fork-must-be-a-team-effort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
