<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>North Fork Preservation Association</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gravel.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gravel.org</link>
	<description>News and information about the NFPA and the North Fork of the Flathead River</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:19:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tester discusses setbacks in Forest Jobs and Recreation bill</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/31/tester-discusses-setbacks-in-forest-jobs-and-recreation-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/31/tester-discusses-setbacks-in-forest-jobs-and-recreation-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Jobs and Recreation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logging mandate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From today&#8217;s Missoulian, here&#8217;s a good overview of the current status of Sen. Jon Tester&#8217;s proposed Forest Jobs and Recreation Act. Short version: Still stuck in committee because of debate over the logging mandate . . .
The first questioner at Sen. Jon Tester&#8217;s Monday public forum in Missoula wanted to know how the Forest Jobs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From today&#8217;s Missoulian, here&#8217;s a good overview of the current status of Sen. Jon Tester&#8217;s proposed Forest Jobs and Recreation Act. Short version: Still stuck in committee because of debate over the logging mandate . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>The first questioner at Sen. Jon Tester&#8217;s Monday public forum in Missoula wanted to know how the Forest Jobs and Recreation Act was coming along.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/article_22a3406a-b4bd-11df-98f1-001cc4c03286.html">Read the full article . . .</a></p>
<p><em>Note: <a href="http://tester.senate.gov/Legislation/foresthome.cfm" target="_blank">See Sen. Tester&#8217;s web site for the full text of the current draft of the Forest Jobs and Recreation Act</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/31/tester-discusses-setbacks-in-forest-jobs-and-recreation-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent wolf &amp; grizzly bear rulings set back progress, biologists, managers say</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/29/recent-wolf-grizzly-bear-rulings-set-back-progress-biologists-managers-say/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/29/recent-wolf-grizzly-bear-rulings-set-back-progress-biologists-managers-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bear recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grizzly bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolf recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a good overview from today&#8217;s Missoulian of the trade-offs involved with two recent federal court rulings concerning wolf and grizzly bear management. Chris Servheen&#8217;s comments regarding the potential negative impact on grizzly bear recovery are particularly interesting . . .
Wolves and bears don&#8217;t behave well in courtrooms.
But the two big predators are likely to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a good overview from today&#8217;s Missoulian of the trade-offs involved with two recent federal court rulings concerning wolf and grizzly bear management. Chris Servheen&#8217;s comments regarding the potential negative impact on grizzly bear recovery are particularly interesting . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Wolves and bears don&#8217;t behave well in courtrooms.</p>
<p>But the two big predators are likely to spend the next 18 months there as their advocates and enemies try to untangle them from the federal Endangered Species Act.</p>
<p>Last week, Montana wildlife managers decided to appeal U.S. District Court Judge Donald Molloy&#8217;s Aug. 5 decision placing the gray wolf back under federal protection. Meanwhile, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service officials in Missoula appealed another Molloy ruling that prevented state management of Yellowstone ecosystem grizzly bears.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://missoulian.com/news/local/article_8159f186-b313-11df-b8db-001cc4c002e0.html">Read the full article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/29/recent-wolf-grizzly-bear-rulings-set-back-progress-biologists-managers-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Noxious weeds in full bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/29/noxious-weeds-in-full-bloom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/29/noxious-weeds-in-full-bloom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knapweed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weeds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s that time again. Here&#8217;s a good overview from today&#8217;s Flathead Beacon on dealing with noxious weeds, especially knapweed . . .
As the summer weather begins to wane and most guests head home, a rather unwelcome visitor makes its presence known in the Flathead Valley. Knapweed is in full bloom, and officials say the valley [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s that time again. Here&#8217;s a good overview from today&#8217;s Flathead Beacon on dealing with noxious weeds, especially knapweed . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>As the summer weather begins to wane and most guests head home, a rather unwelcome visitor makes its presence known in the Flathead Valley. Knapweed is in full bloom, and officials say the valley is approaching the best time to attack them.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s definitely that time of year,&#8221; Flathead County Weed Control and Parks and Recreation Director Jed Fisher said. &#8220;Most noxious weeds are going to seed right now.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/noxious_weeds_in_full_bloom/19292/">Read the full article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/29/noxious-weeds-in-full-bloom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flathead County Planning Board recommends extraction limits in North Fork</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/19/flathead-county-planning-board-recommends-extraction-limits-in-north-fork/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/19/flathead-county-planning-board-recommends-extraction-limits-in-north-fork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extractive industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead County Planning Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLUAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Land Use Advisory Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Zoning District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From today&#8217;s Daily Inter Lake . . .
The Flathead County Planning Board last week recommended limiting the size of extractive industries in the North Fork, but took pains to disassociate itself from a much-publicized memorandum of understanding between Gov. Brian Schweitzer and British Columbia Premier Gordon Campbell.
That memorandum, signed earlier this year, calls for a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From today&#8217;s Daily Inter Lake . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>The Flathead County Planning Board last week recommended limiting the size of extractive industries in the North Fork, but took pains to disassociate itself from a much-publicized memorandum of understanding between Gov. Brian Schweitzer and British Columbia Premier Gordon Campbell.</p>
<p>That memorandum, signed earlier this year, calls for a ban on mining in the North Fork of the Flathead River in the United States and Canada.</p>
<p>Current county regulations require extractive industries in the North Fork Zoning District be of a &#8220;small scale,&#8221; but it is undefined and has not been implemented.</p>
<p>The board&#8217;s recommendation, which will be considered by the county commissioners, would limit extractive industries to five acres in size and allow no more than 20,000 tons of material to be removed each year. Those limits parallel limits set out in the Canadian-U.S. agreement.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://dailyinterlake.com/news/local_montana/article_f50e0762-ab29-11df-87ae-001cc4c03286.html">Read the full article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/19/flathead-county-planning-board-recommends-extraction-limits-in-north-fork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Partnering to protect the Transboundary Flathead watershed</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/19/partnering-to-protect-the-transboundary-flathead-watershed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/19/partnering-to-protect-the-transboundary-flathead-watershed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Schweitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Hadden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headwaters Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorandum of understanding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robin Steinkraus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Hammerquist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave Hadden, director of Headwaters Montana, Robin Steinkraus, executive director of the Flathead Lakers and Will Hammerquist, program manager for the National Parks Conservation Association’s Glacier Field Office have a nice commentary piece in today&#8217;s Flathead Beacon . . .
Here in Montana, August brings us the county fair and farm harvests. And  this year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Hadden, director of Headwaters Montana, Robin Steinkraus, executive director of the Flathead Lakers and Will Hammerquist, program manager for the National Parks Conservation Association’s Glacier Field Office have a nice commentary piece in today&#8217;s Flathead Beacon . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Here in Montana, August brings us the county fair and farm harvests. And  this year we also celebrate a harvest of victories for Glacier National  Park, the North Fork Flathead River and Flathead Lake. In addition to  commemorating Glacier’s first 100 years, citizens from across the  Montana-British Columbia border, Gov. Brian Schweitzer, B.C. Premier  Gordon Campbell and Sens. Max Baucus and Jon Tester did yeoman’s work to  protect this special place.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/partnering_to_protect_the_transboundary_flathead_area1/19149/">Read the full article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/19/partnering-to-protect-the-transboundary-flathead-watershed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chuck Jonkel Night</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/15/chuck-jonkel-night/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/15/chuck-jonkel-night/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 02:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bear research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birthday cake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Jonkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFPA Annual Meeting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many of you know, July 31st was Chuck Jonkel Night &#8230;er, uh&#8230; the NFPA Annual Meeting at Sondreson Hall. We had a great pot luck dinner and, following the business meeting and elections and such, hosted an excellent talk by Charles Jonkel, one the world&#8217;s preeminent bear researchers (more about him here).
Chuck, as usual, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many of you know, July 31st was Chuck Jonkel Night &#8230;er, uh&#8230; the NFPA Annual Meeting at Sondreson Hall. We had a great pot luck dinner and, following the business meeting and elections and such, hosted an excellent talk by Charles Jonkel, one the world&#8217;s preeminent bear researchers (more about him <a href="http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/24/dr-charles-jonkel-to-speak-at-annual-meeting-of-nfpa-on-saturday-july-31-at-community-hall/">here</a>).</p>
<p>Chuck, as usual, drew a big crowd. We also presented him with a surprise birthday cake to celebrate his recent 80th birthday . . .</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gravel.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/jonkel_80th_birthday_cake.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1251" title="Chuck Jonkel - 80th birthday cake" src="http://www.gravel.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/jonkel_80th_birthday_cake.jpg" alt="Chuck Jonkel - 80th birthday cake" width="550" height="412" /></a></p>
<p>Chuck is on the right; John Frederick, NFPA President, is on the left. It was excellent cake!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/15/chuck-jonkel-night/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The road. With humor.</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/15/the-road-with-humor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/15/the-road-with-humor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corridor study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Road]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heavens! We&#8217;ve let two weeks go by without mentioning the road &#8212; in particular, the infamous Montana Department of Transportation&#8217;s North Fork Road Corridor Study (recent posts here, here and here). The Corridor Study has generated hundreds of public comments on all aspects of the issue &#8212; some carefully reasoned, many less so &#8212; but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heavens! We&#8217;ve let two weeks go by without mentioning the road &#8212; in particular, the infamous Montana Department of Transportation&#8217;s North Fork Road Corridor Study (recent posts <a href="http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/29/north-fork-road-draft-study-released-discussed/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/29/lack-of-money-likely-to-deter-north-fork-road-paving-plans-for-now-at-least/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/29/public-comments-sought-on-north-fork-road-corridor-study-draft/">here</a>). The Corridor Study has generated hundreds of public comments on all aspects of the issue &#8212; some carefully reasoned, many less so &#8212; but very little humor. The following letter by North Fork landowner Paul Edwards is an exception. He was, I am told, a professional writer in Hollywood. Personally, I think he is channeling Mark Twain, here. In any event, enjoy the read while I polish up my collection of 19th Century adjectives . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Members of the MDT:</p>
<p>What insanity is this, sirs?  Is there any rational purpose whatever behind a study of the merits of paving an already perfectly adequate gravel road into a tiny, remote, isolated rural community adjacent to a Wild and Scenic River and one of America&#8217;s crown jewel National Parks, whose few year-round residents are overwhelmingly content with that road as it is?</p>
<p>Is there any basis in logic or practicality for spending money to determine whether the public should bear the appalling costs of creating a blacktop highway into de facto wilderness, to an end point where no one lives and beyond which no one can go, through prime habitat for many precious and endangered species that the American people want protected from just such incursions, and that are, due to its present character, largely so protected?</p>
<p>Can there be, in the fevered imaginations of a cadre of delusional boomers and bureaucrats, some intelligible justification for asking the public to finance an absurd highway to nowhere that virtually no one wants, when the all the rest of developed, inhabited, commercially active Flathead Country makes do with its network of badly kept, poorly maintained roads?</p>
<p>Surely, sirs, you by now apprehend the lunacy of this scheme.  Surely you would be embarrassed, nay, shamed, to put your imprimatur on such a monument to utter folly.</p>
<p>Relying, as I do, on the persistent capacity of the human mind, when presented with irrefutable facts and compelling argument, to make the right decisions, even in the face of baldfaced imbecility, I am confident that you will dismiss this piece of egregious foolery out of hand.</p>
<p>You will, of course, recall the episode of the bizarre and redoubtable Sarah Palin and her &#8220;bridge to nowhere&#8221;, and its outcome.  Enough said&#8230;</p>
<p>With tentative respect, pending your decision, I am,</p>
<p>Paul Edwards</p>
<p>Please include my letter in the official record.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/15/the-road-with-humor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Fork protection nearing completion</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/15/north-fork-protection-nearing-completion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/15/north-fork-protection-nearing-completion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead River Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorandum of understanding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Watershed Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trans-boundary Flathead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s an interesting article from the past week&#8217;s Hungry Horse News . . .
A deal to permanently protect the North Fork of the Flathead could come soon, Montana Sen. Jon Tester said last week.
&#8220;Maybe  as soon as September we could get an agreement that is binding,&#8221; Tester  said in a conference call with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting article from the past week&#8217;s Hungry Horse News . . .</p>
<blockquote><p><span>A deal to permanently protect the North Fork of the Flathead could come soon, Montana Sen. Jon Tester said last week.</span></p>
<p><span>&#8220;Maybe  as soon as September we could get an agreement that is binding,&#8221; Tester  said in a conference call with reporters last Thursday.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span><a href="http://www.flatheadnewsgroup.com/articles/2010/08/12/hungryhorsenews/news/news_8718458375_02.txt">Read the full article . . .</a><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/15/north-fork-protection-nearing-completion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crown of the Continent conference planned at Waterton</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/15/crown-of-the-continent-conference-planned-at-waterton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/15/crown-of-the-continent-conference-planned-at-waterton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crown of the Continent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From yesterday&#8217;s Daily Inter Lake . . .
A diverse group of people and organizations who care about the Crown of the Continent are working with The University of Montana Center for Natural Resources and Environmental Policy to organize a conference that will celebrate and build upon the region’s remarkable natural and cultural heritage.
The two-day conference [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From yesterday&#8217;s Daily Inter Lake . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>A diverse group of people and organizations who care about the Crown of the Continent are working with The University of Montana Center for Natural Resources and Environmental Policy to organize a conference that will celebrate and build upon the region’s remarkable natural and cultural heritage.</p>
<p>The two-day conference – “Remarkable Beyond Borders: Shaping the Future of the Crown of the Continent” – is open to anyone interested in the past, present and future of the region. It will take place Thursday and Friday, Sept. 23-24, at the Bayshore Inn, Waterton Lakes National Park, Alberta.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://dailyinterlake.com/news/local_montana/article_4e6907ca-a757-11df-a9e6-001cc4c002e0.html">Read the full article . . .</a></p>
<p>Conference web site: <a href="http://crownroundtable.org/2010Conference.html">http://crownroundtable.org/2010Conference.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/15/crown-of-the-continent-conference-planned-at-waterton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British Columbia wildfires put haze over western Montana</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/07/british-columbia-wildfires-put-haze-over-western-montana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/07/british-columbia-wildfires-put-haze-over-western-montana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 04:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fire Information and Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildfires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From today&#8217;s Missoulian (we *ahem* covered this four days ago) . . .
The smoke we&#8217;re seeing in western Montana is coming from wildfires in British Columbia
Bridget DeRosa of the National Weather Service in Missoula said that while it was hazy in the Missoula and Bitterroot valleys, visibility was still more than 10 miles on Saturday. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From today&#8217;s Missoulian (we *<em>ahem</em>* covered this <a href="http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/03/smoke-in-the-north-fork-may-be-from-canada/">four days ago</a>) . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>The smoke we&#8217;re seeing in western Montana is coming from wildfires in British Columbia</p>
<p>Bridget DeRosa of the National Weather Service in Missoula said that while it was hazy in the Missoula and Bitterroot valleys, visibility was still more than 10 miles on Saturday. But it was reduced to 6 miles in the Flathead Valley around Kalispell.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/article_926c8844-a292-11df-8808-001cc4c03286.html">Read the full story . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/07/british-columbia-wildfires-put-haze-over-western-montana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
