<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>North Fork Preservation Association &#187; coalbed methane</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gravel.org/tag/coalbed-methane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gravel.org</link>
	<description>News and information about the NFPA and the North Fork of the Flathead River</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:33:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>BP sells Canadian coalbed methane assets</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/22/bp-sells-canadian-coalbed-methane-assets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/22/bp-sells-canadian-coalbed-methane-assets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalbed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fernie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mist Mountain Project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BP is selling off a number of assets world-wide to raise money to pay for the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, including their Mist Mountain coalbed methane project near Fernie, BC. As long-time readers may recall, BP originally intended coalbed methane development in the Canadian Flathead as well, but pulled out of that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP is selling off a number of assets world-wide to raise money to pay for the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, including their Mist Mountain coalbed methane project near Fernie, BC. As long-time readers may recall, BP originally intended coalbed methane development in the Canadian Flathead as well, but pulled out of that region in response to public outcry. Presumably, the new owner, Apache Corporation, will continue to honor this restriction.</p>
<p>More reading . . .</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefreepress.ca/article/20100721/FERNIE0101/307259999/-1/fernie/bp-sells-fernie-coal-bed-methane-project-to-apache-corp">BP sells Fernie coal bed methane project to Apache Corp</a> (the Fernie Free Press)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE66J4O420100721">BP shops assets to cover oil spill costs</a> (Reuters)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/22/bp-sells-canadian-coalbed-methane-assets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More coverage of BC&#8217;s North Fork mining and energy development ban</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/02/10/more-coverage-of-bcs-north-fork-mining-and-energy-development-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/02/10/more-coverage-of-bcs-north-fork-mining-and-energy-development-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalbed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re starting to see more &#8212; and more detailed &#8212; coverage of British Columbia&#8217;s decision to forgo resource extraction activities in the Canadian Flathead River Valley. Two good articles appeared today. The Daily Inter Lake did a nice, balanced job . . . The lieutenant governor of British Columbia announced Tuesday that all types of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re starting to see more &#8212; and more detailed &#8212; coverage of British Columbia&#8217;s decision to forgo resource extraction activities in the Canadian Flathead River Valley. Two good articles appeared today.</p>
<p>The Daily Inter Lake did a nice, balanced job . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>The lieutenant governor of British Columbia announced Tuesday that all types of mining and oil and gas development “will not be permitted” in the province’s portion of the Flathead Valley.</p>
<p>It was news that was well received in Montana.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyinterlake.com/news/local_montana/article_b764b968-1607-11df-9860-001cc4c03286.html">Read the entire article . . .</a></p>
<p>Unsurprisingly, the Environmental News Service write-up was a bit heavier on quotes from various environmental outfits, but also includes considerable background information . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Mining and drilling for oil, gas and coal will be banned in the Canadian  portion of the Flathead River Basin, under a new partnership with the  state of Montana announced Tuesday in British Columbia&#8217;s Speech from the  Throne, an annual address that identifies the Province&#8217;s legislative  priorities for the coming year.</p>
<p>British Columbia Lieutenant Governor Steven Point declared, &#8220;A new  partnership with Montana will sustain the environmental values in the  Flathead River Basin in a manner consistent with current forestry,  recreation, guide outfitting and trapping uses. It will identify  permissible land uses and establish new collaborative approaches to  transboundary issues.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/feb2010/2010-02-10-01.html">Read the entire article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/02/10/more-coverage-of-bcs-north-fork-mining-and-energy-development-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BC declares North Fork off limits to mining &amp; energy development</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/02/09/bc-declares-north-fork-off-limits-to-mining-energy-development/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/02/09/bc-declares-north-fork-off-limits-to-mining-energy-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalbed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the annual &#8220;Throne Speech,&#8221; British Columbia Lt. Gov. Steven Point declared the Canadian portion of the Flathead River Valley off limits to mining and energy extraction. Assuming no subtle weasel-wording, this means B.C. just shut the door to activities such as coal and gold mining and coalbed methane development in the Canadian North Fork. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the annual &#8220;Throne Speech,&#8221; British Columbia Lt. Gov. Steven Point declared the Canadian portion of the Flathead River Valley off limits to mining and energy extraction. Assuming no subtle weasel-wording, this means B.C. just shut the door to activities such as coal and gold mining and coalbed methane development in the Canadian North Fork. Word is, Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer will be flying to Vancouver, B.C., next week to sign a memorandum of understanding committing both the state and the province to work towards the same goals for the Flathead River Basin on their respective sides of the border.</p>
<p>Currently, the Missoulian has the most detailed coverage . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>British Columbia Lt. Gov. Steven Point declared the Canadian portion of the Flathead River Valley off limits to mining and energy extraction in a speech to his parliament on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Citing a new partnership with Montana, Point said the Flathead River Basin would be managed for existing types of forestry, recreation, guide outfitting and trapping uses.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://missoulian.com/news/local/article_454ec652-15d5-11df-ab0b-001cc4c03286.html">Read the entire article . . .</a></p>
<p>The Flathead Beacon has an Associated Press write-up . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>British Columbia&#8217;s government said Tuesday it will not permit mining or  drilling in a remote valley along the Montana border that companies have  been trying to develop for 25 years.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/b.c._government_says_it_will_prohibit_mining_in_the_flathead/15945/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+flatheadbeacon+Flathead+Beacon+Headlines">Read the entire article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/02/09/bc-declares-north-fork-off-limits-to-mining-energy-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flathead Coalition review pans BP&#8217;s environmental study</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2009/06/01/flathead-coalition-review-pans-bps-environmental-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2009/06/01/flathead-coalition-review-pans-bps-environmental-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 03:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens Concerned About Coalbed Methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalbed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mist Mountain Project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Flathead Coalition is less than amused at BP-Canada&#8217;s approach to environmental science. They don&#8217;t think much of British Columbia&#8217;s fox-guarding-the-henhouse rules for conducting environmental studies, either. A press release pubished today by Citizens Concerned About Coalbed Methane summarizes the issue . . . The Flathead Coalition announced today that its internal evaluation of BP-Canada [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.flatheadcoalition.org/">Flathead Coalition</a> is less than amused at BP-Canada&#8217;s approach to environmental science. They don&#8217;t think much of British Columbia&#8217;s fox-guarding-the-henhouse rules for conducting environmental studies, either.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://concernedaboutcbm.org/news/flathead-coalition-says-bp%E2%80%99s-science-seriously-flawed">press release pubished today</a> by <a href="http://concernedaboutcbm.org/">Citizens Concerned About Coalbed Methane</a> summarizes the issue . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>The Flathead Coalition announced today that its internal evaluation of BP-Canada Energy Company’s environmental science demonstrates bias toward understating the likely environmental impact of its proposed Mist Mountain CBM project.</p>
<p>The Mist Mountain CBM project is being planned by BP-Canada for the Crowsnest Coalfield area that spans the Elk River and Flathead River hydrologic divide. The B.C. government granted tenure last December for the Elk Valley portions of the coalfield. BP says it plans to start exploratory drilling in early 2010, though it may commence sooner.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://concernedaboutcbm.org/news/flathead-coalition-says-bp%E2%80%99s-science-seriously-flawed">Read the entire article</a> . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2009/06/01/flathead-coalition-review-pans-bps-environmental-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bennett fires back with haughty e-mail</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2009/02/06/bennett-fires-back-with-haughty-e-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2009/02/06/bennett-fires-back-with-haughty-e-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal-bed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalbed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fernie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a curiousity. Just a year ago, Bill Bennett, British Columbia&#8217;s mining minister, was forced to resign due to some wildly intemperate remarks regarding opposition to resource development in the Canadian Flathead. Bennett, now Tourism, Culture and Arts Minister, is at it again. This time, he was responding to a Fernie area tourism operator accusing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a curiousity. Just a year ago, Bill Bennett, British Columbia&#8217;s mining minister, was forced to resign due to some wildly intemperate remarks regarding opposition to resource development in the Canadian Flathead. Bennett, now Tourism, Culture and Arts Minister, is at it again. This time, he was responding to a Fernie area tourism operator accusing Bennett of being more interested in coalbed methane development than tourism.</p>
<p>From the Thursday, February 5, 2009 online edition of <a href="http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/">24 Hours Vancouve</a>r . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Tourism, Culture and Arts Minister Bill Bennett has described a tourism operator in his riding as having &#8220;bigoted&#8221; and &#8220;ignorant&#8221; opinions &#8211; accusing Steve Kuijt of writing a &#8220;vicious and mean-spirited&#8221; e-mail, which &#8220;may well be libelous.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/News/local/2009/02/05/8272206-sun.html">Read the entire article</a> . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2009/02/06/bennett-fires-back-with-haughty-e-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groups renew call to expand Waterton into B. C. river valley</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2009/02/01/groups-renew-call-to-expand-waterton-into-b-c-river-valley/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2009/02/01/groups-renew-call-to-expand-waterton-into-b-c-river-valley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cline Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalbed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead River Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mist Mountain Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strip mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterton Lakes National Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterton Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Saturday, January 31, 2009 online edition of the Calgary Herald . . . Conservation groups are renewing calls for Waterton Lakes National Park to be expanded into the Flathead River Valley, despite British Columbia&#8217;s decision to close the door to coal bed methane development in the ecologically key area in southeastern B.C. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Saturday, January 31, 2009 online edition of the <a href="http://www.calgaryherald.com/">Calgary Herald</a> . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Conservation groups are renewing calls for Waterton Lakes National Park to be expanded into the Flathead River Valley, despite British Columbia&#8217;s decision to close the door to coal bed methane development in the ecologically key area in southeastern B.C.</p>
<p>The Sierra Club, Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, Wildsight and others say the relatively untouched valley is still imperilled.</p>
<p>&#8220;Until we have permanent protection for the Flathead River Valley in the form of a national park, it is still threatened by future coal bed methane proposals,&#8221; said Sarah Cox, a spokeswoman for Sierra Club B. C. &#8220;And it&#8217;s under threat from a proposal for strip mining coal and other minerals.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www2.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/city/story.html?id=deeea69e-4a5a-4a5e-8859-477188f31f78">Read the entire article</a> . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2009/02/01/groups-renew-call-to-expand-waterton-into-b-c-river-valley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stalemate, some success, retirement</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2009/01/11/stalemate-some-success-retirement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2009/01/11/stalemate-some-success-retirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cline Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalbed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead Basin Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Moy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Sunday, January 11, 2009 online edition of the Missoulian . . . The coal was here, hidden by a thin skin of wilderness, long before Rich Moy arrived; and it was still here, against all odds, when he left. That, he considers, is at least some sort of success, although much more work [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Sunday, January 11, 2009 online edition of the <a href="http://www.missoulian.com/">Missoulian</a> . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>The coal was here, hidden by a thin skin of wilderness, long before Rich Moy arrived; and it was still here, against all odds, when he left.</p>
<p>That, he considers, is at least some sort of success, although much more work will be required to keep it there, buried beneath what&#8217;s wild.</p>
<p>&#8220;In many ways, it&#8217;s been a stalemate for 30 years,&#8221; Moy said. &#8220;We haven&#8217;t lost much ground, but we haven&#8217;t gained any, either. The Canadian Flathead and the wilderness north of Glacier National Park have been and will be a flashpoint of international controversy.&#8221;</p>
<p>When Moy arrived on this backcountry battlefield, nearly three decades ago, the then-new controversy centered on a proposed Canadian coal mine to be built just a few miles north of Glacier Park.</p>
<p>When he finally retired last month, on the last day of 2008, the now-old controversy centered on yet another coal mine proposed in the headwaters, and a second coal mine in the river bottom, and a gold mine, and a phosphate mine, and an ongoing search for coalbed methane.</p>
<p>&#8220;In all these decades,&#8221; he said, &#8220;the British Columbia government has never wavered in its desire to industrialize the Flathead.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.missoulian.com/articles/2009/01/11/news/local/news03.txt">Read the entire article</a> . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2009/01/11/stalemate-some-success-retirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on BP&#8217;s Mist Mountain coalbed methane project</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2008/12/07/more-on-bps-mist-mountain-coalbed-methane-project/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2008/12/07/more-on-bps-mist-mountain-coalbed-methane-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Petroleum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal-bed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalbed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elk River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mist Mountain Project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a follow-up to yesterday&#8217;s post regarding the Mist Mountain coalbed methane project, here are links to some additional information . . . Our friends in Fernie, BC are not very happy about BP Canada&#8217;s plans. See the Citizens Concerned About Coalbed Methane site for details. Wildsight posted a press release last Friday that does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>As a follow-up to yesterday&#8217;s post regarding the Mist Mountain coalbed methane project, here are links to some additional information . . .</em></p>
<p>Our friends in Fernie, BC are not very happy about BP Canada&#8217;s plans. See the <a href="http://cccbm.org/">Citizens Concerned About Coalbed Methane</a> site for details.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wildsight.ca/">Wildsight</a> posted a <a href="http://www.wildsight.ca/news/378">press release last Friday</a> that does a good job of summarizing the problems local residents have with coalbed methane development. It also links to some additional material.</p>
<p>BP&#8217;s <a href="http://www.bp.com/modularhome.do?categoryId=8070&amp;contentId=7035480">Mist Mountain Coalbed Gas Project</a> site is another source of information. In particular, the <a href="http://www.bp.com/sectiongenericarticle.do?categoryId=9020105&amp;contentId=7037525">maps page</a> is a bit of an eye-opener.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the Flathead connection? Earlier this year, BP withdrew their efforts to explore the Canadian Flathead for coalbed methane development, but left the door open to return at a later date. (See <a href="http://www.gravel.org/2008/02/28/bp-still-mulling-coal-bed-extraction/">this post</a>, for example.) Mist Mountain is in the Elk River watershed, not far from the Flathead headwaters and already the site of an open pit mine and a proposed wind farm. Events there are a good predictor of what might happen if that sort of activity spills over into the Flathead Valley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2008/12/07/more-on-bps-mist-mountain-coalbed-methane-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian Flathead left out of natural-gas deal</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2008/12/06/canadian-flathead-left-out-of-natural-gas-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2008/12/06/canadian-flathead-left-out-of-natural-gas-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 19:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Petroleum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal-bed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalbed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glacier National Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mist Mountain Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Parks Conservation Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Neufeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Hammerquist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Saturday, December 6, 2008 online edition of the Daily Inter Lake . . . BP Canada on Friday received natural-gas rights for a potential energy project in a segment of British Columbia watched closely by environmental activists in both the province and in Montana. British Columbia granted the rights to BP for its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Saturday, December 6, 2008 online edition of the <a href="http://www.dailyinterlake.com/">Daily Inter Lake</a> . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>BP Canada on Friday received natural-gas rights for a potential energy project in a segment of British Columbia watched closely by environmental activists in both the province and in Montana.</p>
<p>British Columbia granted the rights to BP for its proposed Mist Mountain coal-bed methane project in the province&#8217;s southeast, after the Flathead River Basin was removed from the project area. In the debate about possible environmental effects from Mist Mountain coal-bed methane work, the border-spanning Flathead had been particularly prominent, with activists in Montana raising the specter of harm traveling downstream.</p>
<p>Even with the Flathead removed, the prospect of the coal-bed methane project in combination with other current and proposed industrial activity in southeastern British Columbia is alarming, said Will Hammerquist of the National Parks Conservation Association in Whitefish near Glacier National Park, which extends to the British Columbia border.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyinterlake.com/articles/2008/12/06/news/local_montana/news04.txt">Read the entire article</a> . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2008/12/06/canadian-flathead-left-out-of-natural-gas-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Area residents looking at protection of the Flathead Valley in Southeast BC</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2008/11/26/area-residents-looking-at-protection-of-the-flathead-valley-in-southeast-bc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2008/11/26/area-residents-looking-at-protection-of-the-flathead-valley-in-southeast-bc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalbed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead River Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strip mining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Tuesday, November 25, 2008 online edition of the Keremeos Review . . . Seven out of ten Kootenay residents want to protect the Flathead River Valley as a national park, according to new polling results released today by Wildsight and Sierra Club BC. The poll, conducted by McAllister Opinion Research, found that 73 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Tuesday, November 25, 2008 online edition of the <a href="http://www.bclocalnews.com/okanagan_similkameen/keremeosreview/">Keremeos Review</a> . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Seven out of ten Kootenay residents want to protect the Flathead River Valley as a national park, according to new polling results released today by Wildsight and Sierra Club BC. The poll, conducted by McAllister Opinion Research, found that 73 per cent of residents in East Kootenay, Nelson-Creston and Columbia River-Revelstoke favour protecting the Flathead River Valley in southeastern B.C.</p>
<p>The Flathead River Valley is compared to Africa&#8217;s Serengeti for its richness of plant species and was recently called &#8220;a nursery&#8221; for wildlife by Canadian Geographic magazine. The valley is under threat from proposals for coal strip mining, coalbed methane drilling and unbridled mineral extraction.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.bclocalnews.com/okanagan_similkameen/keremeosreview/news/35102754.html">Read the entire article</a> . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2008/11/26/area-residents-looking-at-protection-of-the-flathead-valley-in-southeast-bc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

