<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>North Fork Preservation Association &#187; North Fork Flathead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gravel.org/tag/north-fork-flathead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gravel.org</link>
	<description>News and information about the NFPA and the North Fork of the Flathead River</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>60 years ago: &#8220;Oil boom&#8221; in the North Fork</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2011/07/20/60-years-ago-oil-boom-in-the-north-fork/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2011/07/20/60-years-ago-oil-boom-in-the-north-fork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sage Creek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hungry Horse News has a short article on all the excitement 60 years ago surrounding oil exploration efforts in the North Fork just over the line in Canada at Sage Creek . . . Large headlines in August 1951 declared oil drilling would start in the North Fork. This was exciting news with hopes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hungry Horse News has a short article on all the excitement 60 years ago surrounding oil exploration efforts in the North Fork just over the line in Canada at Sage Creek . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Large headlines in August 1951 declared oil drilling would start in the North Fork. This was exciting news with hopes for commercial quantities, new road punched through to the rest of Canada, economic values on the undeveloped valley between primitive mountain areas.</p>
<p>It was reported the oil drilling venture culminated nearly 50 years of drilling by stock supported companies. Drilling was for Petroleum Oil Co., which had a number of producing wells in Alberta.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="http://www.flatheadnewsgroup.com/hungryhorsenews/article_c2f6bdd0-b2dc-11e0-99f4-001cc4c002e0.html">Continue reading . . .</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2011/07/20/60-years-ago-oil-boom-in-the-north-fork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warming trend will cause Flathead River rise</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2011/06/21/warming-trend-will-cause-flathead-river-rise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2011/06/21/warming-trend-will-cause-flathead-river-rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flood Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[river levels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The spate of warmer weather is expected to increase water flow in the Flathead River. The current forecast for the North Fork shows it exceeding flood level briefly at the Canadian border late Thursday/early Friday. The Daily Inter Lake has a write-up . . . With a significant warming trend expected this week, the National [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spate of warmer weather is expected to increase water flow in the Flathead River. The current forecast for the North Fork shows it exceeding flood level briefly at the Canadian border late Thursday/early Friday.</p>
<p>The Daily Inter Lake has a write-up . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>With a significant warming trend expected this week, the National Weather Service is forecasting increased flooding potential for some Western Montana rivers, including the Flathead River.</p>
<p>The Flathead River at Columbia Falls could reach or exceed flood stage by Thursday or Friday, but other rivers such as the Whitefish and Stillwater Rivers are no longer expected to exceed flood stage without a major rain event, meteorologist Bruce Bauck said during a conference call on Monday.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="http://www.dailyinterlake.com/news/local_montana/article_1d0dbe3a-9baa-11e0-ad6c-001cc4c03286.html">Continue reading . . .</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2011/06/21/warming-trend-will-cause-flathead-river-rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three grizzly bears captured as part of the NCDE monitoring effort; other grizzly bear news</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2011/06/15/three-grizzly-bears-captured-as-part-of-the-ncde-monitoring-effort-other-grizzly-bear-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2011/06/15/three-grizzly-bears-captured-as-part-of-the-ncde-monitoring-effort-other-grizzly-bear-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grizzly bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks press release, posted today on the Flathead Beacon web site, is a North Fork-specific follow-up on the grizzly bear monitoring effort announced three weeks ago: Grizzly bear population capture efforts for monitoring in the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) have concluded in the North Fork Drainage. Three bears were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks press release, posted today on the Flathead Beacon web site, is a North Fork-specific follow-up on the <a title="Biologists to begin grizzly bear capturing for research and management" href="http://www.gravel.org/2011/05/25/biologists-to-begin-grizzly-bear-capturing-for-research-and-management/">grizzly bear monitoring effort announced three weeks ago</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Grizzly bear population capture efforts for monitoring in the Northern  Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) have concluded in the North Fork  Drainage.  Three bears were captured and fitted with radio transmitters  during the effort.   FWP Biologists will closely follow the bears’  movements.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">FWP Biologist Rick Mace notes that the successful  capture operation will enable FWP to monitor the survival and  reproduction of grizzly bears in this important area of the NCDE.  It  was recently concluded that the grizzly bear population in the NCDE is  growing at a rate of 3 percent per year, based on an analysis and  publication by Mace and his colleagues in an upcoming edition of The  Journal of Wildlife Management.  Grizzly bear monitoring capture efforts  now move to other areas of the NCDE.  The project is primarily funded  by FWP and the U. S. Forest Service.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">In other grizzly bear news, an adult female grizzly and her  yearling were captured in the Blankenship Bridge area of the North Fork  of the Flathead Drainage on June 13.  The two grizzlies were released  today in the Coal Creek area.  The bears were grazing on green grass at  private residences.  The move was a pre-emptive measure to avoid  conflicts with residents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2011/06/15/three-grizzly-bears-captured-as-part-of-the-ncde-monitoring-effort-other-grizzly-bear-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New West runs feature on North Fork Watershed Protection Act</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2011/06/10/new-west-runs-feature-on-north-fork-watershed-protection-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2011/06/10/new-west-runs-feature-on-north-fork-watershed-protection-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead River Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Watershed Protection Act of 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online media publication New West ran a feature Wednesday on the North Fork Watershed Protection Act, including some nice local quotes from NFPA President John Frederick . . . An ongoing effort to protect a shared river drainage on the Montana-Canada border from mining damage will not inhibit recreational users, hunters or logging activity, Montana’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online media publication New West ran a feature Wednesday on the North Fork Watershed Protection Act, including some nice local quotes from NFPA President John Frederick . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>An ongoing effort to protect a shared river drainage on the  Montana-Canada border from mining damage will not inhibit recreational  users, hunters or logging activity, Montana’s senior senator promises.</p>
<p>According to a statement from Sen. Max Baucus, D-Montana, the North Fork Watershed Protection Act  would solidify an agreement between Montana and British Columbia to  prohibit new mining and energy exploration  in the million-acre northern  Flathead River basin, which extends across the Canadian line.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/us_canadian_gentlemans_agreement_to_protect_montana_river/C618/L618/">Continue reading &#8220;U.S.-Canadian ‘Gentleman’s Agreement’ To Protect Montana River&#8221; . . .</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2011/06/10/new-west-runs-feature-on-north-fork-watershed-protection-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Devon Energy still owns 74 leases in the Flathead; retirement likely</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2011/02/27/devon-energy-still-owns-74-leases-in-the-flathead-retirement-likely/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2011/02/27/devon-energy-still-owns-74-leases-in-the-flathead-retirement-likely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil leases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very informative article posted late last night to the Missoulian&#8217;s web site . . . While about 80 percent of existing energy exploration leases in the North Fork Flathead have been retired by the world&#8217;s leading oil, gas and mining companies, a handful of parcels remain in contention by smaller firms. Those holdings include [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very informative article posted late last night to the Missoulian&#8217;s web site . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>While about 80 percent of existing energy exploration leases in the North Fork Flathead have been retired by the world&#8217;s leading oil, gas and mining companies, a handful of parcels remain in contention by smaller firms.</p>
<p>Those holdings include nearly 138,000 acres in Flathead County that extend into the Haskill Basin drainage, the primary source of Whitefish&#8217;s drinking water supply, as well as along the western edge of Glacier National Park in the Flathead National Forest and underneath Big Mountain.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/article_4dcfce28-4231-11e0-936a-001cc4c002e0.html">Continue reading . . .</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2011/02/27/devon-energy-still-owns-74-leases-in-the-flathead-retirement-likely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BP retires oil and gas leases in and near the North Fork</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/11/22/bp-retires-oil-and-gas-lease-in-and-near-the-north-fork/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/11/22/bp-retires-oil-and-gas-lease-in-and-near-the-north-fork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Petroleum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polebridge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BP has climbed on the bandwagon, retiring their local oil and gas leases, including &#8220;a 394-acre parcel near the Polebridge entrance to Glacier National Park.&#8221; The Missoulian has the story . . . The oil company BP voluntarily gave up its rights to explore for energy along the western border of Glacier National Park, U.S. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP has climbed on the bandwagon, retiring their local oil and gas leases, including &#8220;a 394-acre parcel near the Polebridge entrance to Glacier National Park.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Missoulian has the story . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>The oil company BP voluntarily gave up its rights to explore for energy along the western border of Glacier National Park, U.S. Sens. Max Baucus and Jon Tester announced Friday.</p>
<p>&#8220;Permanently protecting the North Fork for our kids and grandkids has been one of my biggest priorities for many years,&#8221; Baucus said in a written statement. &#8220;Today&#8217;s decision by BP is another step toward that goal.&#8221;</p>
<p>The deal takes 1,853 acres out of potential exploration. That includes a 394-acre parcel near the Polebridge entrance to Glacier National Park.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://missoulian.com/news/local/article_8384326c-f410-11df-9fc0-001cc4c03286.html">Read the full article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/11/22/bp-retires-oil-and-gas-lease-in-and-near-the-north-fork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Border patrol at Saturday NFLA meeting</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/09/03/border-patrol-at-saturday-nfla-meeting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/09/03/border-patrol-at-saturday-nfla-meeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 01:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border patrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Abegglen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sondreson Hall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Wackrow sent out this reminder today. For background information, see the article &#8220;Border Patrol agents on North Fork to increase from four to 50-plus&#8221; published in this summer&#8217;s newsletter . . . Just a reminder that David Abegglen, agent in charge of the Whitefish office of the Border Patrol (out of which the North [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Wackrow sent out this reminder today. For background information, see the article &#8220;<a href="http://gravel.org/newsletters/BP%20agents%20on%20North%20Fork%20to%20increase%20from%204%20to%2050plus.pdf" target="_blank">Border Patrol agents on North Fork to increase from four to 50-plus</a>&#8221; published in this summer&#8217;s newsletter . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Just a reminder that David Abegglen, agent in charge of the Whitefish office of the Border Patrol (out of which the North Fork is patrolled), will be at the Saturday North Fork Landowners’ Association meeting. That’s 8 p.m. at Sondreson Hall.</p>
<p>This might be our last best chance before the February or July 2011 Inter Local Agreement meeting to ask him questions about Border Patrol operations on the North Fork.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/09/03/border-patrol-at-saturday-nfla-meeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mining ban on North Fork federal lands clears Senate committee</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/06/mining-ban-on-north-fork-federal-lands-clears-senate-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/06/mining-ban-on-north-fork-federal-lands-clears-senate-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water quality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted early this morning to the Missoulian&#8217;s website . . . A measure that would ban federal-land mining along Glacier National Park&#8217;s western edge has passed a major Senate hurdle, and has been expanded to provide water-quality protections for nearby communities&#8230; &#8230;the bill banning future federal mine leases has been expanded from its original to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted early this morning to the Missoulian&#8217;s website . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>A measure that would ban federal-land mining along Glacier National Park&#8217;s western edge has passed a major Senate hurdle, and has been expanded to provide water-quality protections for nearby communities&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;the bill banning future federal mine leases has been expanded from its original to include the watershed upstream of Whitefish Lake, the nearby Haskill Basin drainage, and the wild and scenic Middle Fork Flathead corridor.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://missoulian.com/news/local/article_7163dbb0-a10d-11df-a95a-001cc4c03286.html">Read the full article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/06/mining-ban-on-north-fork-federal-lands-clears-senate-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Montana senators&#8217; North Fork bill passes committee</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/06/montana-senators-north-fork-bill-passes-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/06/montana-senators-north-fork-bill-passes-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flathead Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil leases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Associated Press . . . Montana&#8217;s U.S. Senators Max Baucus and Jon Tester announced today that their federal legislation to protect the Upper Flathead Valley has cleared a major hurdle. Read the full article . . .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Associated Press . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Montana&#8217;s U.S. Senators Max Baucus and Jon Tester announced today that their federal legislation to protect the Upper Flathead Valley has cleared a major hurdle.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nbcmontana.com/news/24527377/detail.html">Read the full article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/08/06/montana-senators-north-fork-bill-passes-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting the North Fork must be a team effort</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/17/protecting-the-north-fork-must-be-a-team-effort/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/17/protecting-the-north-fork-must-be-a-team-effort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Schweitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Hadden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headwaters Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Fork Flathead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trans-boundary Flathead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave Hadden, Executive Director of Headwaters Montana, had a letter to the editor published in today&#8217;s Flathead Beacon . . . The North Fork of the Flathead River (a.k.a. the Transboundary Flathead) continues to play in the news of late. The news media report that Gov. Brian Schweitzer and Sens. Max Baucus and Jon Tester [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Hadden, Executive Director of Headwaters Montana, had a letter to the editor published in today&#8217;s Flathead Beacon . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>The North Fork of the Flathead River (a.k.a. the Transboundary Flathead) continues to play in the news of late. The news media report that Gov. Brian Schweitzer and Sens. Max Baucus and Jon Tester are at odds over how to best protect our river, Glacier Park and Flathead Lake from upstream industrial activity. While a bit confusing to the reader, we think it&#8217;s important to keep the North Fork in the news for one simple reason: Our fabulous North Fork ain&#8217;t protected yet.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/letter_protecting_the_north_fork_must_be_a_team_effort/18674/">Read the complete letter . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/07/17/protecting-the-north-fork-must-be-a-team-effort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

