<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>North Fork Preservation Association &#187; wilderness designation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gravel.org/tag/wilderness-designation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gravel.org</link>
	<description>News and information about the NFPA and the North Fork of the Flathead River</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:06:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Baucus will sponsor Rocky Mountain Front Heritage Act</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2011/10/29/baucus-will-sponsor-rocky-mountain-front-heritage-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2011/10/29/baucus-will-sponsor-rocky-mountain-front-heritage-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain Front Heritage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness designation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=2393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted yesterday evening to the Missoulian (includes a nice map) . . . U.S. Sen. Max Baucus announced Friday he will sponsor a bill to expand the wilderness on the Rocky Mountain Front, saying the proposal has a good chance of being the first wilderness designation in the state since the early 1980s. Conservationists who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted yesterday evening to the Missoulian (includes a nice map) . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>U.S. Sen. Max Baucus announced Friday he will sponsor a bill to expand the wilderness on the Rocky Mountain Front, saying the proposal has a good chance of being the first wilderness designation in the state since the early 1980s.</p>
<p>Conservationists who have been working on the Rocky Mountain Front Heritage Act for about six years tout the measure as a compromise among varied groups aimed at keeping development and road access on the Front at its current levels. Opponents have said more wilderness designations could hinder access, mineral exploration and ranching operations.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/baucus-to-sponsor-rocky-mountain-front-heritage-act-to-add/article_166235cc-01c4-11e1-ab4d-001cc4c002e0.html">Continue reading . . .</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2011/10/29/baucus-will-sponsor-rocky-mountain-front-heritage-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tester’s &#8220;Forest Jobs and Recreation Act&#8221; gets new Senate hearing</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2011/05/25/tester%e2%80%99s-forest-jobs-and-recreation-act-gets-new-senate-hearing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2011/05/25/tester%e2%80%99s-forest-jobs-and-recreation-act-gets-new-senate-hearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 01:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Jobs and Recreation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logging mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness designation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From an AP article posted in today&#8217;s Flathead Beacon . . . U.S. Sen. Jon Tester&#8217;s bill to increase both logging and wilderness areas in Montana was the focus of another Senate hearing Wednesday as the Democrat hopes to move forward a plan that has already become an issue in his high-profile election challenge from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From an AP article posted in today&#8217;s Flathead Beacon . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>U.S. Sen. Jon Tester&#8217;s bill to increase both logging and wilderness  areas in Montana was the focus of another Senate hearing Wednesday as  the Democrat hopes to move forward a plan that has already become an  issue in his high-profile election challenge from Republican U.S. Rep.  Denny Rehberg.</p>
<p>The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee  in Washington again took testimony on a re-introduced version of a bill  Tester first put forward nearly two years ago. Committee members  expressed interest in working with Tester to advance a measure that died  late last year as part of a last-minute budget bill.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/testers_forest_bill_gets_new_senate_hearing/23221/">Continue reading . . .</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2011/05/25/tester%e2%80%99s-forest-jobs-and-recreation-act-gets-new-senate-hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tester announces changes to &#8220;wilderness bill&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/02/05/tester-announces-changes-to-wilderness-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/02/05/tester-announces-changes-to-wilderness-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Jobs and Recreation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness designation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve been following the progress of Sen. Jon Tester&#8217;s Forest Jobs and Recreation Act, this is fairly interesting. From today&#8217;s Missoulian . . . Reacting to both criticism and constructive advice, Sen. Jon Tester revealed a thick list of changes to his Forest Jobs and Recreation Act during a visit to Missoula on Friday. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve been following the progress of Sen. Jon Tester&#8217;s Forest Jobs and Recreation Act, this is fairly interesting.</p>
<p>From today&#8217;s Missoulian . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Reacting to both criticism and constructive advice, Sen. Jon Tester revealed a thick list of changes to his Forest Jobs and Recreation Act during a visit to Missoula on Friday.</p>
<p>In all, Tester proposed 21 changes to S. 1470&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/article_66d05fde-12b5-11df-97c2-001cc4c002e0.html">Read the entire article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/02/05/tester-announces-changes-to-wilderness-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tester’s &#8220;wilderness bill&#8221; far from a sure thing</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/01/10/tester%e2%80%99s-wilderness-bill-far-from-a-sure-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/01/10/tester%e2%80%99s-wilderness-bill-far-from-a-sure-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Jobs and Recreation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness designation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=1015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s Missoulian has a pretty good status report &#8212; with video, no less &#8211;  on Senator Jon Tester&#8217;s proposed Forest Jobs and Recreation Act. Here&#8217;s the lead-in . . . U.S. Sen. Jon Tester&#8217;s Forest Jobs and Recreation Act awaits committee action in Washington, D.C., but back home his fellow Montanans are busy pushing and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s Missoulian has a pretty good status report &#8212; with video, no less &#8211;  on Senator Jon Tester&#8217;s proposed Forest Jobs and Recreation Act.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the lead-in . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>U.S. Sen. Jon Tester&#8217;s Forest Jobs and Recreation Act awaits committee action in Washington, D.C., but back home his fellow Montanans are busy pushing and pulling at the proposed wilderness set-asides and logging mandates.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://missoulian.com/news/local/article_ed1ff7b8-fdaf-11de-b1b1-001cc4c002e0.html">Read the entire article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/01/10/tester%e2%80%99s-wilderness-bill-far-from-a-sure-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Practical politics: Rehberg stance on Tester&#8217;s &#8220;wilderness bill&#8221; a concern</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2010/01/04/practical-politics-rehberg-stance-on-testers-wilderness-bill-a-concern/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2010/01/04/practical-politics-rehberg-stance-on-testers-wilderness-bill-a-concern/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denny Rehberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Jobs and Recreation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness designation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watching Senator Jon Tester&#8217;s &#8220;Forest Jobs and Recreation Act&#8221; make its way through the system is a real lesson in practical politics. It made it past the initial, more or less pro forma hearings in front of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Now, Congressman Denny Rehberg is getting into the act with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching Senator Jon Tester&#8217;s &#8220;Forest Jobs and Recreation Act&#8221; make its way through the system is a real lesson in practical politics. It made it past the initial, more or less <em>pro forma</em> hearings in front of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Now, Congressman Denny Rehberg is getting into the act with a series of &#8220;listening sessions&#8221; around Montana.</p>
<p>An AP article by Matthew Brown posted today offers a good overview of the situation with Rehberg and some interesting analysis. Here&#8217;s the money quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>As Rehberg tours the state this week to gauge public support for the measure, observers say where the Republican comes down could either help seal Tester&#8217;s biggest legislative achievement since his 2006 election &#8212; or put up a major roadblock to the bill&#8217;s success.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/rehberg_stance_on_testers_wilderness_bill_could_be_pivotal/15107/">Read the entire article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2010/01/04/practical-politics-rehberg-stance-on-testers-wilderness-bill-a-concern/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times posts coverage on upcoming &#8220;Forest Jobs and Recreation Act&#8221; hearings</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2009/12/15/new-york-times-posts-coverage-on-upcoming-forest-jobs-and-recreation-act-hearings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2009/12/15/new-york-times-posts-coverage-on-upcoming-forest-jobs-and-recreation-act-hearings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Jobs and Recreation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness designation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday&#8217;s New York Times carried coverage, with a minimum of snark, on Senator Jon Tester&#8217;s proposed &#8220;Forest Jobs and Recreation Act&#8221; bill. The article includes a pretty good discussion of the issues likely to be covered during the upcoming hearings on the bill, which are scheduled for this Thursday. Trying to satisfy everyone from wilderness [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday&#8217;s New York Times carried coverage, with a minimum of snark, on Senator Jon Tester&#8217;s proposed &#8220;Forest Jobs and Recreation Act&#8221; bill. The article includes a pretty good discussion of the issues likely to be covered during the upcoming hearings on the bill, which are scheduled for this Thursday.</p>
<blockquote><p>Trying to satisfy everyone from wilderness advocates to timber companies, Sen. Jon Tester has proposed a new model for managing national forests.</p>
<p>The Democrat&#8217;s controversial proposal, which he has dubbed the &#8220;Forest Jobs and Recreation Act&#8221; to emphasize its economic aspects rather than its wilderness components, would guide how federal agencies manage large swaths of land in his home state of Montana.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/12/14/14greenwire-sen-testers-plan-for-wilderness-logging-roils-b-4200.html?pagewanted=all">Read the entire article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2009/12/15/new-york-times-posts-coverage-on-upcoming-forest-jobs-and-recreation-act-hearings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Headwaters Montana advocates North Fork wilderness</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2009/10/28/headwaters-montana-advocates-north-fork-wilderness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2009/10/28/headwaters-montana-advocates-north-fork-wilderness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glacier National Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headwaters Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mount Hefty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thompson-Seton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterton Lakes National Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness designation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Wednesday, October 14, 2009 online edition of the Hungry Horse News . . . There&#8217;s a renewed push for wilderness in the North Fork. Headwaters Montana, a relatively new conservation group has released a plan for land conservation on both sides of the border. Tucked in that plan is a call for 140,000 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Wednesday, October 14, 2009 online edition of the Hungry Horse News . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>There&#8217;s a renewed push for wilderness in the North Fork. <a href="http://www.headwatersmontana.org/" target="_blank">Headwaters Montana</a>, a relatively new conservation group has released a plan for land conservation on both sides of the border.</p>
<p>Tucked in that plan is a call for 140,000 acres of designated wilderness in the Thompson-Seton and Mount Hefty areas.</p>
<p>But the plan doesn&#8217;t end there. It includes a wilderness designation for Glacier&#8217;s backcountry, expansion of Waterton Lakes National Park to the Canadian Flathead and wildlife management zones west of the Waterton expansion.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.flatheadnewsgroup.com/articles/2009/10/22/hungryhorsenews/news/news_8744463336_01.txt">Read the entire article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2009/10/28/headwaters-montana-advocates-north-fork-wilderness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wilderness debate heats up</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2009/08/09/wilderness-debate-heats-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2009/08/09/wilderness-debate-heats-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Jobs and Recreation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roadless rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness designation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s an interesting article in today&#8217;s Missoulian discussing the renewed debate over designation and expansion of wilderness areas . . . For more than three decades, millions of Montana federal acres have been de facto wilderness. Over the past few weeks, those slumbering lands have been shoved back into the spotlight. And last Wednesday, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting article in today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.missoulian.com/">Missoulian</a> discussing the renewed debate over designation and expansion of wilderness areas . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>For more than three decades, millions of Montana federal acres have been de facto wilderness.</p>
<p>Over the past few weeks, those slumbering lands have been shoved back into the spotlight. And last Wednesday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declared the nation&#8217;s 40 million acres of &#8220;inventoried roadless lands&#8221; were properly protected by a 2001 Clinton administration prohibition on development.</p>
<p>But the 10th Circuit Court in Wyoming is deliberating on a mirror-reverse case, where a lower-court judge has declared the Clinton rule is wrong. That would leave standing a subsequent Bush administration rule allowing states to make their own rules governing federal roadless land.</p>
<p>And in between, Sen. Jon Tester&#8217;s proposed Forest Jobs and Recreation Act might open 1 million acres of Montana roadless land to logging, according to some of its critics.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/article_2cb5e3b2-8568-11de-a1a1-001cc4c03286.html">Read the entire article . . .</a> <em>[link repaired]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2009/08/09/wilderness-debate-heats-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tester&#8217;s forest bill faces challenges</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2009/07/29/testers-forest-bill-faces-challenges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2009/07/29/testers-forest-bill-faces-challenges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Jobs and Recreation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness designation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Flathead Beacon has a good overview, minus the sound bites and PR-speak, of the challenges faced by Sen. Jon Tester&#8217;s Forest Jobs and Recreation Act. Here&#8217;s the lede . . . Jon Tester&#8217;s recently introduced Forest Jobs and Recreation Act may be the most significant piece of legislation he has created in his, still [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/">Flathead Beacon</a> has<a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/forest_jobs_bill_an_ambitious_gambit_by_tester/12003/"> a good overview</a>, minus the sound bites and PR-speak, of the challenges faced by Sen. Jon Tester&#8217;s Forest Jobs and Recreation Act. Here&#8217;s the lede . . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Jon Tester&#8217;s recently introduced Forest Jobs and Recreation Act may be the most significant piece of legislation he has created in his, still relatively short, career in the U.S. Senate.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/forest_jobs_bill_an_ambitious_gambit_by_tester/12003/">Read the entire article . . .</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2009/07/29/testers-forest-bill-faces-challenges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full text of proposed &#8220;Forest Jobs and Recreation Act&#8221; available</title>
		<link>http://www.gravel.org/2009/07/23/full-text-of-proposed-forest-jobs-and-recreation-act-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravel.org/2009/07/23/full-text-of-proposed-forest-jobs-and-recreation-act-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nfpa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Jobs and Recreation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness designation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravel.org/?p=635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you who prefer your information raw and unfiltered, this page has links to the full text of Sen Jon Tester&#8217;s proposed &#8220;Forest Jobs and Recreation Act&#8221; and to the associated &#8220;Proposed Land Designations&#8221; map: http://tester.senate.gov/Legislation/forestresources.cfm. A comfortable chair and beverage of choice recommended prior to reading.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who prefer your information raw and unfiltered, this page has links to the full text of Sen Jon Tester&#8217;s proposed &#8220;Forest Jobs and Recreation Act&#8221; and to the associated &#8220;Proposed Land Designations&#8221; map: <a href="http://tester.senate.gov/Legislation/forestresources.cfm" target="_blank">http://tester.senate.gov/Legislation/forestresources.cfm</a>.</p>
<p>A comfortable chair and beverage of choice recommended prior to reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravel.org/2009/07/23/full-text-of-proposed-forest-jobs-and-recreation-act-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

