From the Thursday, August 23, 2007 online edition of the Hungry Horse News . . .

Montana Sen. Jon Tester has raised opposition to coal bed methane exploration and development in the Canadian Flathead. But the company that plans on doing the drilling claims it will do the work in an environmentally sensitive manner.

Tester, in a letter earlier this month to Andy Inglis, the chief executive of energy and exploration for British Petroleum, said he had “serious reservations and opposition” to BP Canada Energy Company’s recent proposal to begin coal bed methane exploration in the Flathead.

The river forms most of the western boundary of Glacier National Park. Opponents in the U.S. claim CBM development in Canada would harm not only the water quality here, but would also harm large carnivores like wolves and grizzly bears, which routinely cross the border into Canada.

Coal bed methane development requires a large network of football field-sized well pads and roads to serve them.

The disturbance is compounded by millions of gallons of wastewater from the operations that in, in most cases, is unpotable and toxic to fish and anything else that consumes it.

Read the entire article . . .

This Associated Press story appeared in the Wednesday, September 5, 2007 online editions of the Daily Inter Lake and the Flathead Beacon . . .

Montana’s U.S. senators Wednesday asked Canada to give Montana scientists a voice in assessing potential environmental effects from proposed coal mining and coal-bed methane work in southeastern British Columbia.

Industrial development in that part of the province, north of Montana’s Glacier National Park, has raised concerns in the state about possible harm to water quality in the transboundary Flathead River system.

Montana scientists should have a place in Canada’s federal environmental assessments for a mining proposal by Canada-based Cline Mining Co., and for potential coal-bed methane extraction by British Petroleum, Democratic Sens. Jon Tester and Max Baucus wrote Michael Wilson, Canada’s ambassador to the United States.

Read the entire article . . .

From the Thursday, August 9, 2007 online edition of the Daily Inter Lake . . .

British Petroleum has formally applied for an exploration permit for coal-bed methane gas in the Flathead and Elk River drainages of southeastern British Columbia, a provincial liaison to the Flathead Basin Commission said Wednesday.

And a representative for Gov. Brian Schweitzer announced that the administration intends to organize a Montana-British Columbia Symposium late this year as part of an effort to revive discussions over the future of the transboundary Flathead drainage.

Kathy Eichenberger, representing the B.C. Ministry of Environment, said BP has applied for an exploratory permit. She subsequently was peppered with questions at a basin commission meeting in Somers.

Read the entire article . . .

From the Thursday, August 9, 2007 online edition of the Bigfork Eagle . . .

The interconnectivity of northwest Montana’s water sources serve as a double-edged sword.

On one hand, the connections promote a diverse ecosystem and help filter pollutants. On the other hand, large disturbances can impact massive areas.

Dr. Richard Hauer’s lecture, titled “Critical linkages in our waterscapes: River, groundwater and lake connections,” showed the intricate web of Flathead’s water systems.

This connectivity is one reason Dr. Hauer said the mining proposals in British Columbia are such a threat. The proposed coal mine and coal bed methane exploration sites are located at the head of the North Fork of the Flathead River in Canada, which is just 22 miles from the border.

Read the entire article . . .

From the Wednesday, August 8, 2007 online edition of The Globe and Mail . . .

As two coal-based mining projects begin to move ahead in British Columbia, an effort by the province and neighbouring Montana to work together on the environmental effects of mining has cooled off.

Nearly two years after the two jurisdictions began work on a way to deal with cross-border concerns over proposed resource developments, there is still no approved plan, and no formal talks are scheduled.

Meanwhile, a metallurgical coal mine and a potential $3-billion coal bed methane project are moving ahead, although both are at very early stages.

“We’re at a little bit of an impasse, but we haven’t given up,” said John van Dongen, B.C. Minister of State for Intergovernmental Relations. “We’re working on it.”

Mike Volesky, natural resources adviser to Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer, wouldn’t call it an impasse, but he confirmed there have been no formal talks since December, 2006. He was uncertain whether the dialogue could be restarted before the fall.

Read the entire article . . .

From the Wednesday, August 1, 2007 online edition of the Flathead Beacon . . .

Representatives of several northwestern states including Montana, Canadian provinces, and large corporations converged on Anchorage, Alaska last week to attend the Pacific NorthWest Economic Region

From the Friday, July 27, 2007 online edition of the Daily Inter Lake . . .

A gathering of U.S. and Canadian government and business leaders in Alaska this week has caught the attention of Montanans concerned about coal development in British Columbia

This is getting ridiculous.

From the Tuesday, July 10, 2007 online edition of the Daily Inter Lake . . .

When County Commissioner Gary Hall heard there was a package addressed to him on the steps of the commissioners