All posts by nfpa

Senators to Canada: Review should include Montana scientists

This Associated Press story appeared in the Wednesday, September 5, 2007 online editions of the Daily Inter Lake and the Flathead Beacon . . .

Montana’s U.S. senators Wednesday asked Canada to give Montana scientists a voice in assessing potential environmental effects from proposed coal mining and coal-bed methane work in southeastern British Columbia.

Industrial development in that part of the province, north of Montana’s Glacier National Park, has raised concerns in the state about possible harm to water quality in the transboundary Flathead River system.

Montana scientists should have a place in Canada’s federal environmental assessments for a mining proposal by Canada-based Cline Mining Co., and for potential coal-bed methane extraction by British Petroleum, Democratic Sens. Jon Tester and Max Baucus wrote Michael Wilson, Canada’s ambassador to the United States.

Read the entire article . . .

Mining here? It wouldn

From the Wednesday, August 15, 2007 online edition of the Daily Inter Lake . . .

Occasionally, we get correspondence from our good neighbors to the north, claiming that Montanans are hypocritical in opposing mine development in the Canadian Flathead when there is active mine development elsewhere in Montana.

Well, yes, it is true that there is mining in Montana. Gov. Brian Schweitzer is pursuing coalbed methane development as well as coal-to-liquid fuel projects in southeastern Montana. There are also precious metal mines in Montana that are gradually moving forward, despite controversy.

So how can Montanans have the nerve to be concerned about coal extraction in British Columbia

Coal-bed permits sought

From the Thursday, August 9, 2007 online edition of the Daily Inter Lake . . .

British Petroleum has formally applied for an exploration permit for coal-bed methane gas in the Flathead and Elk River drainages of southeastern British Columbia, a provincial liaison to the Flathead Basin Commission said Wednesday.

And a representative for Gov. Brian Schweitzer announced that the administration intends to organize a Montana-British Columbia Symposium late this year as part of an effort to revive discussions over the future of the transboundary Flathead drainage.

Kathy Eichenberger, representing the B.C. Ministry of Environment, said BP has applied for an exploratory permit. She subsequently was peppered with questions at a basin commission meeting in Somers.

Read the entire article . . .

The threat of Canada’s mines

From the Thursday, August 9, 2007 online edition of the Bigfork Eagle . . .

The interconnectivity of northwest Montana’s water sources serve as a double-edged sword.

On one hand, the connections promote a diverse ecosystem and help filter pollutants. On the other hand, large disturbances can impact massive areas.

Dr. Richard Hauer’s lecture, titled “Critical linkages in our waterscapes: River, groundwater and lake connections,” showed the intricate web of Flathead’s water systems.

This connectivity is one reason Dr. Hauer said the mining proposals in British Columbia are such a threat. The proposed coal mine and coal bed methane exploration sites are located at the head of the North Fork of the Flathead River in Canada, which is just 22 miles from the border.

Read the entire article . . .

B.C.’s coal bed dreams inch ahead amid border impasse

From the Wednesday, August 8, 2007 online edition of The Globe and Mail . . .

As two coal-based mining projects begin to move ahead in British Columbia, an effort by the province and neighbouring Montana to work together on the environmental effects of mining has cooled off.

Nearly two years after the two jurisdictions began work on a way to deal with cross-border concerns over proposed resource developments, there is still no approved plan, and no formal talks are scheduled.

Meanwhile, a metallurgical coal mine and a potential $3-billion coal bed methane project are moving ahead, although both are at very early stages.

“We’re at a little bit of an impasse, but we haven’t given up,” said John van Dongen, B.C. Minister of State for Intergovernmental Relations. “We’re working on it.”

Mike Volesky, natural resources adviser to Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer, wouldn’t call it an impasse, but he confirmed there have been no formal talks since December, 2006. He was uncertain whether the dialogue could be restarted before the fall.

Read the entire article . . .

Fire Information Links Updated

The Fire Information Links page has been updated. It provides links to local fire news, maps, reports, status, imagery and weather.

About 70% of the links had to be changed. (Apparently, a large swathe of the U.S. government indulged in a web site rebuilding frenzy over the past year.) The information is basically the same, but has moved around quite a bit.

As in past years, the Daily Inter Lake continues to be the best general news source for local fire information.

The Fire Information Links page is always available in the “NFPA Site Links” area in the upper left corner of this page.

Ban on campfires takes effect today

From the Monday, July 30, 2007 online edition of the Daily Inter Lake . . .

Starting today, new fire restrictions will prohibit all campfires across Northwest Montana.

Stage Two fire restrictions will apply to all lands under the protection of the Montana Department of Natural Resources, the Flathead and Kootenai national forests and Glacier National Park, along with Lake, Sanders, Lincoln and Flathead counties. The restrictions also apply to lands managed by Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

The Bob Marshall Wilderness will remain under Stage One fire restrictions, which allow campfires in designated areas.

Read the entire article . . .