All posts by nfpa

Montana accuses B.C. of breaking green pact

From the Friday, September 14, 2007 online edition of The Globe and Mail . . .

Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer is accusing Premier Gordon Campbell of breaching a four-year-old pact to protect environmentally sensitive areas that straddle the border.

Mr. Schweitzer, in a three-page letter sent Aug. 22, says the province’s decision to allow two projects – a coal mine and a coal bed methane development – to proceed through the early stages of permission is of “continued concern” to the state and a breach of the 2003 Environmental Cooperation Arrangement between Montana and British Columbia.

“Since the signing of the Environmental Cooperation Arrangement there have been five separate proposals for exploratory and industrial fossil fuel development in the British Columbia Flathead,” the letter states. “I believe the intent [of the arrangement] is not being met and the proposed fossil fuel developments over the past five years run contrary to the language of the arrangement …”

The governor’s letter – combined with combative language on Monday from Montana’s two U.S. senators, Max Baucus and Jon Tester – points to an escalation of the cross-border war of words over potential resource development in southeastern B.C.

Read the entire article . . .

BP Coalbed Methane and Cline Mine

From the Tuesday, September 11, 2007 online edition of the Flathead Beacon . . .

In a Washington D.C. meeting with executives for British Petroleum, U.S. Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., issued his harshest rebukes yet for BP’s coalbed methane exploration proposal in the Canadian Flathead, according to a release sent from his office Monday afternoon. Baucus also called for public meetings in Kalispell to allow Montanans to weigh in on the project.

BP can expect “a knock-down, drag-out fight” and “a massive and unpleasant fight from Montana that will end badly” Baucus told BP America Chairman and President Bob Malone and BP Canada chief Randy McLeod, according to the release.

Baucus’s threats refer specifically to BP’s intent to file an exploratory permit for what it calls its “Mist Mountain” coalbed methane (CBM) extraction project in southeastern British Columbia.

Read the entire article . . .

BP moves ahead with mine

From the Thursday, September 6, 2007 online edition of the Bigfork Eagle . . .

For a company that tries to sell itself as a green corporation, British Petroleum is expected to go ahead with plans that could industrialize the Canadian Flathead, watchdogs on this side of the border claim.

The Flathead Basin Commission recently learned that BP will seek an exploratory permit to drill for coal-bed methane in the Canadian Flathead River drainage.

Read the entire article . . .

Tester, BP square off on North Fork gas drilling

From the Thursday, August 23, 2007 online edition of the Hungry Horse News . . .

Montana Sen. Jon Tester has raised opposition to coal bed methane exploration and development in the Canadian Flathead. But the company that plans on doing the drilling claims it will do the work in an environmentally sensitive manner.

Tester, in a letter earlier this month to Andy Inglis, the chief executive of energy and exploration for British Petroleum, said he had “serious reservations and opposition” to BP Canada Energy Company’s recent proposal to begin coal bed methane exploration in the Flathead.

The river forms most of the western boundary of Glacier National Park. Opponents in the U.S. claim CBM development in Canada would harm not only the water quality here, but would also harm large carnivores like wolves and grizzly bears, which routinely cross the border into Canada.

Coal bed methane development requires a large network of football field-sized well pads and roads to serve them.

The disturbance is compounded by millions of gallons of wastewater from the operations that in, in most cases, is unpotable and toxic to fish and anything else that consumes it.

Read the entire article . . .

Senators to Canada: Review should include Montana scientists

This Associated Press story appeared in the Wednesday, September 5, 2007 online editions of the Daily Inter Lake and the Flathead Beacon . . .

Montana’s U.S. senators Wednesday asked Canada to give Montana scientists a voice in assessing potential environmental effects from proposed coal mining and coal-bed methane work in southeastern British Columbia.

Industrial development in that part of the province, north of Montana’s Glacier National Park, has raised concerns in the state about possible harm to water quality in the transboundary Flathead River system.

Montana scientists should have a place in Canada’s federal environmental assessments for a mining proposal by Canada-based Cline Mining Co., and for potential coal-bed methane extraction by British Petroleum, Democratic Sens. Jon Tester and Max Baucus wrote Michael Wilson, Canada’s ambassador to the United States.

Read the entire article . . .

Mining here? It wouldn

From the Wednesday, August 15, 2007 online edition of the Daily Inter Lake . . .

Occasionally, we get correspondence from our good neighbors to the north, claiming that Montanans are hypocritical in opposing mine development in the Canadian Flathead when there is active mine development elsewhere in Montana.

Well, yes, it is true that there is mining in Montana. Gov. Brian Schweitzer is pursuing coalbed methane development as well as coal-to-liquid fuel projects in southeastern Montana. There are also precious metal mines in Montana that are gradually moving forward, despite controversy.

So how can Montanans have the nerve to be concerned about coal extraction in British Columbia

Coal-bed permits sought

From the Thursday, August 9, 2007 online edition of the Daily Inter Lake . . .

British Petroleum has formally applied for an exploration permit for coal-bed methane gas in the Flathead and Elk River drainages of southeastern British Columbia, a provincial liaison to the Flathead Basin Commission said Wednesday.

And a representative for Gov. Brian Schweitzer announced that the administration intends to organize a Montana-British Columbia Symposium late this year as part of an effort to revive discussions over the future of the transboundary Flathead drainage.

Kathy Eichenberger, representing the B.C. Ministry of Environment, said BP has applied for an exploratory permit. She subsequently was peppered with questions at a basin commission meeting in Somers.

Read the entire article . . .

The threat of Canada’s mines

From the Thursday, August 9, 2007 online edition of the Bigfork Eagle . . .

The interconnectivity of northwest Montana’s water sources serve as a double-edged sword.

On one hand, the connections promote a diverse ecosystem and help filter pollutants. On the other hand, large disturbances can impact massive areas.

Dr. Richard Hauer’s lecture, titled “Critical linkages in our waterscapes: River, groundwater and lake connections,” showed the intricate web of Flathead’s water systems.

This connectivity is one reason Dr. Hauer said the mining proposals in British Columbia are such a threat. The proposed coal mine and coal bed methane exploration sites are located at the head of the North Fork of the Flathead River in Canada, which is just 22 miles from the border.

Read the entire article . . .